Back

Understanding inequalities in COVID-19 vaccination between migrants and non-migrants in Germany: The role of psychological factors of vaccine behaviour

Bartig, S.; Siegert, M.; Hoevener, C.; Michalski, N.

2026-04-17 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.15.26350844 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Understanding the underlying mechanisms for differences in vaccine uptake between migrants and non-migrants is crucial in order to design targeted interventions encouraging vaccination and to ensure vaccine-related equity. Therefore, this study examined to what extent migration-related disparities in COVID-19 vaccination were associated with psychological factors, based on the established 5C model of vaccine behaviour (Confidence, Complacency, Constraints, Calculation, Collective Responsibility). Methods: Data were obtained from the German study "Corona Monitoring Nationwide - Wave 2" (RKI-SOEP-2 study), which was carried out between November 2021 and March 2022. The association between COVID-19 vaccination and migration status, while considering the psychological factors, was investigated using multivariable binary logistic regressions. A decomposition analysis (Karlson-Holm-Breen method) was conducted to examine the extent to which migration-related disparities in vaccine uptake were associated with the psychological factors of the 5C framework. Results: Migrants were less likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19 compared to non-migrants, especially participants from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Our decomposition showed that almost two-thirds of the disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake between migrants and non-migrants were associated with the psychological factors (first-generation: 61.2%, second-generation: 64.2%). Confidence in safety of the vaccine was the most relevant factor in the 5C framework. Furthermore, the results highlighted the importance of a differentiated analysis regarding country of origin: While the 5C model accounted for only 19.4% of the difference between participants from the MENA region and non-migrants, the proportion for participants from Eastern Europe was 73.5%, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms for the lower uptake in the MENA group need further investigation. Conclusions: Overall, migration-related disparities in COVID-19 vaccination were significantly associated with differences in psychological factors of vaccine behaviour. To increase vaccine acceptance within the heterogeneous group of migrants in general, tailored and proactive health communication interventions are needed.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
2
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.2%
3
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
5
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
8
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
10
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
18
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
21
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
24
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%