Back

Evaluating the impact of school-based interventions on youth loneliness: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sticpewich, L.; Stuttard, H.; Bu, F.; Fancourt, D.; Hayes, D.

2026-04-16 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.15.26349177 medRxiv
Show abstract

Aims: Youth loneliness is a prevalent global health concern with lifelong health ramifications. Schools, as children's primary peer environments, are promising settings for loneliness interventions. However, school-based interventions are highly heterogeneous and no review to date has evaluated their effect on loneliness specifically. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies of school-based interventions measuring loneliness as an outcome in children and young people aged up to 18. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to pool effect sizes and examine the significance of intervention characteristics and study design. Reported implementation factors were extracted and narratively synthesised. Results: Thirty-eight studies were included in meta-analysis, of which 19 were randomized controlled trials, ten were non-randomized controlled, and nine were single group studies. A small-to-moderate effect estimate was found, Hedges' g = -0.42 [95% CI: -0.71, -0.13], p = .006, and sub-group analyses indicated that differences in study design and quality did not result in significantly different effect estimates. Psychological interventions, followed by social and emotional skills training, produced significantly higher effects estimates compared with other intervention types. Conclusions: Findings indicate that school-based interventions are effective in reducing youth loneliness. However, study heterogeneity, reporting inconsistencies, and a wide prediction interval indicates this finding should be interpreted with caution. Future research may benefit from improved measurement and reporting of implementation factors, particularly dosage and fidelity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.0%
2
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.3%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.0%
5
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
9
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
10
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
12
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
14
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
16
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%