Back

Decoding Diets: Applying Non-Linear Machine Learning Models to Geometric Morphometric Analysis of Bovid Dental Mesowear Signatures

Harbert, R. A.; Kovarovic, K.; Gruwier, B.

2026-04-20 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.14.718578 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dental morphology and wear patterns provide insight into the dietary adaptations and ecological niches of living and extinct herbivores. Traditional classification statistics such as Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) are limited by assumptions of linearity, normality, and homoscedasticity. This study quantifies mesowear, the shape of molar cusps resulting from occlusal wear, and evaluates the performance of non-linear machine learning models in predicting herbivore diets based on geometric morphometric (GMM) data from adult mandibular second molars (M2) in bovids. We applied Generalized Procrustes Analysis and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to digitized occlusal shape coordinates from 132 M2 specimens across 64 species. Using the resulting principal component scores, we compared the classification accuracy of LDA with three non-linear models: Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Gradient Boosting. While LDA achieved a cross-validated accuracy of just 31%, all non-linear models achieved 99% cross-validation accuracy and 90% test accuracy, demonstrating substantially improved performance. Misclassification analyses revealed that non-linear models more effectively captured complex shape differences, particularly among species with overlapping wear patterns. Our findings support the integration of machine learning with geometric morphometrics to quantify mesowear and improve dietary classification, providing a framework for robust paleoecological inference.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.6%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.1%
5
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 15%
4.7%
8
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
9
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
11
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
12
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.3%
14
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
17
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
18
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
21
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
22
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
23
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
25
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
26
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.2%
27
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
28
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
29
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%