Back

sigNATURE maps cohort-specific T-cell states to reproducible programs of ICI response

Kamath, S.; Park, H. J.; Kim, S.; Jin, X.; Wang, J. H.

2026-04-15 immunology
10.64898/2026.04.14.718532 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can induce durable responses across cancers, yet T-cell biomarkers of response remain difficult to reproduce across single-cell RNA-seq studies. A major reason is that T-cell states are typically defined de novo within each cohort, making reported marker genes sensitive to cohort composition and analytic choices rather than stable cellular programs. Here we present sigNATURE (signature Normalization and Atlas-based T-cell Understanding for Reproducibility and Evaluation), a reference-guided framework that maps query cells onto large CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell atlases, evaluates published ICI-response markers in an atlas-aligned coordinate system, and quantifies the atlas support of mapped cells through a cell-level identifiability score. We applied sigNATURE to two independent ICI scRNA-seq cohorts comprising 36 non-small cell lung cancer patients and 15 skin cancer patients (11 basal cell carcinoma and 4 squamous cell carcinoma). Across cohorts, sigNATURE-derived features more robustly resolved response-associated T-cell structure than cohort-derived state definitions, yielding clearer unsupervised separation of responders and non-responders, enabling integrated analysis of independent studies in a shared atlas-aligned space, and improving mean response-prediction AUC from 0.469 to 0.746. Using identifiability score, we further identify terminally differentiated effector CD8+ T cells and regulatory CD4+ T cells as prominent response-associated states across studies, prioritizing published markers in terms of robust, atlas-resolvable cell states. Using this framework. Together, these results establish sigNATURE as a framework for improving the reproducibility, cross-cohort comparability, and mechanistic interpretability of single-cell ICI biomarkers.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 12%
13.9%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
3
Nature Immunology
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 13%
3.8%
5
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
6
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
7
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
8
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
11
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.0%
12
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
13
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.5%
14
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
15
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.0%
16
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
19
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
20
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
21
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
22
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.3%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
24
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
28
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%