Back

Contrasting transcriptional responses and genetic determinants underlie Zymoseptoria tritici adaptation mechanisms to simulated host defense environments

Minana-Posada, S.; Feurtey, A.; McDonald, B. A.; Lorrain, C.

2026-04-16 genomics
10.64898/2026.04.14.718361 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Successful colonization of the wheat apoplast requires that Zymoseptoria tritici tolerate host-derived stresses, but the mechanisms underlying this adaptation remain poorly understood. We combined phenotypic assays, transcriptomics, and genome-wide association analyses to characterize fungal responses to acidic pH, salicylic acid, gibberellic acid, and oxidative stress. Exposure to salicylic acid inhibited in vitro growth across a global collection of 411 Z. tritici strains, whereas acidic pH promoted growth, illustrating contrasting effects on pathogen performance of environments simulating host-defense responses. At the transcriptional level, acidic pH and oxidative stress induced the strongest and most similar responses, while salicylic acid elicited a more distinct transcriptional program and gibberellic acid caused only limited transcriptional changes. Although the sets of differentially expressed genes were largely condition specific, overlapping enrichment of transport- and redox-related functions across conditions indicated shared transcriptional responses. K-mer based genome-wide association mapping identified five candidate loci associated with growth under acidic pH, gibberellic acid and salicylic acid, including four loci specific to a single growth condition. These loci colocalized with genes implicated in cell wall remodeling, nitrogen metabolite regulation, proteostasis, and ubiquitin-related processes. This study highlights the multifaceted strategies employed by Z. tritici to navigate environments simulating host-defense responses, involving shared and environment-specific adaptations. We provide new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of fungal resilience, with implications for understanding pathogen-host interactions.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.8%
2
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.8%
3
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.2%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
6.1%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.8%
8
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
10
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
11
Frontiers in Fungal Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
12
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
14
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
15
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
16
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
17
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
19
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
20
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.2%
23
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
24
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
27
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.7%