Back

Thermal responses of an emerging temperate mosquito reshape arboviral transmission risk

Bahrami, R.; Da Re, D.; Khorramnejad, A.; Gingell, D. D.; Brustolin, M.; Müller, R.; Damiani, C.; Bonizzoni, M.; Mancini, M. V.

2026-04-16 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.14.718355 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Global warming is known to increase arboviral disease risk by enabling the expansion of tropical vectors such as Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. However, whether climate-driven shifts in seasonal dynamics within temperate regions, such as warmer springs and shorter winters, create thermal settings favourable for additional vectors, which can reshape disease risk maps, is poorly understood. To answer this question, we used the invasive temperate mosquito species Aedes koreicus and tested its thermal developmental resilience, along with its vector competence for dengue and chikungunya viruses. We observed significant phenotypic variation in thermal tolerance across life stages, which translates into distinct thermal performance curves for life-history traits, ultimately shaping overall mosquito fitness. We further found that temperature effects are virus-specific, with differential impacts on infection and transmission between dengue and chikungunya viruses. These stage- and pathogen-specific responses generate carry-over effects across life stages, indicating that thermal responses may be constrained by life-history trade-offs rather than be defined by a single thermal optimum. Our results highlight the need to move beyond static, species-based risk assessments toward mechanistic frameworks that integrate thermal biology across life stages and vector-pathogen systems. As climate change increasingly reshapes seasonal structure rather than simply elevating mean temperatures, cold-adapted and temperate vectors such as Ae. koreicus, provide critical model systems to understand how transmission risk emerges outside mosquito classical thermal optima, calling for a broader paradigm shift in how global change and vector-borne disease risk are conceptualised.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.8%
2
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.9%
4
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.9%
6
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.5%
8
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
11
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
12
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
15
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
16
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
17
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
20
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%