Back

Functional divergence of DSCAM family in vertebrates through domain-specific evolutionary pressures

Hashizume, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Oota, H.; Hoshino, M.

2026-04-15 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.14.718097 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (DSCAM) family, conserved across metazoans, plays key roles in neural development by mediating cell-cell recognition. Invertebrate Dscam evolved extensive molecular diversity through isoform diversification, whereas the vertebrate paralogs DSCAM and DSCAML1 followed a distinct evolutionary trajectory. However, how these vertebrate paralogs evolved after duplication, particularly with respect to functional divergence, remains poorly understood. Here, we investigated the evolutionary history and post-duplication divergence of these paralogs using phylogenetic, molecular evolutionary, sequence comparison, and transcriptomic analyses. Our phylogenetic analyses suggest an ancestral gene duplication predating the split between gnathostomes and cyclostomes. We found distinct patterns of selective constraint between the paralogs, particularly in the intracellular domain. In tetrapods, the intracellular domain of DSCAM showed strengthened purifying selection, whereas no comparable reinforcement was evident for DSCAML1, despite strong constraint in mammals. We also found distinct patterns of lineage- and site-specific positive selection between DSCAM and DSCAML1. Consistent with these evolutionary differences, comparative analysis of the intracellular domains revealed distinct repertoires of short linear motifs (SLiMs) predicted to mediate protein-protein interactions. Reanalysis of published transcriptomic data further suggested distinct downstream responses elicited by the intracellular domains of DSCAM and DSCAML1. Together, these findings suggest that post-duplication functional divergence of vertebrate DSCAM paralogs may have contributed to the evolution of molecular mechanisms underlying vertebrate neural development and circuit formation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.3%
2
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.2%
3
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
5
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
6
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
8
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.2%
10
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.0%
13
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
16
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
23
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.2%
25
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Angiogenesis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%