Back

Enzyme activity as an actionable axis for small-molecule precision oncology

Fujita, K.; Kamiya, M.; Dan, S.; Tachibana, R.; Kawatani, M.; Kojima, R.; Hino, R.; Kobayashi, K.; Inoue, S.; Tani, M.; Hirata, Y.; Kawashima, S.; Yamazaki, K.; Nishimura, Y.; Ohashi, Y.; Isoyama, S.; Nakada, A.; Matsumoto, N.; Ikegaya, Y.; Nakajima, J.; Urano, Y.

2026-04-15 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.04.14.717586 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Current precision oncology--molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies--relies on genomic or expressed biomarkers, yet most cancer patients remain ineligible for these treatments. Here, we establish enzyme activity as an actionable and orthogonal axis for precision cancer medicine. Strategic activity-based screening of mouse organs and human clinical specimens with a panel of enzyme-reactive fluorescence probes identified {beta}-galactosidase 1 (GLB1) and {beta}-hexosaminidases (HEX) as broadly elevated tumor-selective biomarkers. Leveraging these activities, we developed 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN38)-based GLB1-and HEX-reactive prodrugs. These prodrugs exhibited dramatically reduced systemic toxicities and improved therapeutic windows, compared to a clinically used SN38-based prodrug, irinotecan (CPT-11). Both prodrugs demonstrated activity-dependent therapeutic efficacy, affording a dramatic reduction of tumor volumes across multiple in vivo models, including a subcutaneous patient-derived xenograft (PDX) of lung squamous cell carcinoma that lacked genetic alterations targeted by current precision medicine. Furthermore, this strategy is broadly applicable across various cytotoxic payloads, establishing a generalizable platform for small-molecule precision medicines. Our results define an enzyme-targeting paradigm for precision oncology, in which fluorescence probes serve as companion diagnostic tools to guide development and selection of appropriately targeted prodrugs, which are expected to provide safer and more efficacious treatment options for cancer patients with elevated enzyme activities.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
2
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.1%
4
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
5
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
7
Molecular Therapy Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.4%
9
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
12
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.4%
13
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
14
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
15
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
16
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.4%
20
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
22
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
24
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
25
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
27
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
28
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
30
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%