Back

Pan-cancer circular genomics identifies intratumoral Staphylococcus lugdunensis as a metabolic driver in bladder cancer

Wang, T.; Zhao, M.; Li, C.; Bai, Z.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, H.; Lv, W.; Lin, C.; Kong, D.; Zhao, X.; Wang, P.; Mao, F.

2026-04-16 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.04.14.717102 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intratumoral microbiota play key roles in cancer but are challenging to profile due to low biomass. We developed CIRCMIP, an enzymatic pipeline that eliminates linear DNA to enrich bacterial genomes, achieving 100-fold higher sensitivity than standard metagenomics. Applied to 312 pan-cancer specimens, CIRCMIP identified Staphylococcus lugdunensis as a signature bacterium enriched in early-stage bladder cancer (BLCA), where its presence predicts poor survival. Integrated modeling and lipidomics revealed that Staphylococcus lugdunensis colonization drives aberrant lipid metabolism with secretion of LPC14:0. Both Staphylococcus lugdunensis and LPC14:0 drive BLCA progression by promoting fatty acid uptake and {beta}-oxidation. Mechanistically, chemical proteomics revealed LPC14:0 as a direct PPAR{delta} ligand, binding via hydrogen bonds with Thr292/Thr289. This activation upregulates fatty acid transporters (CD36, FABP4) and metabolic enzymes (ACOX2), fueling malignant proliferation. Furthermore, CIRCMIP-derived biomarkers show robust diagnostic accuracy, establishing a new research paradigm and revealing the Staphylococcus lugdunensis-LPC14:0-PPAR{delta} axis as a therapeutic target in bladder cancer. HIGHLIGHTO_LICIRCMIP leverages DNA circularity to achieve 100-fold sensitivity in pan-cancer bacteriome profiling. C_LIO_LIStaphylococcus lugdunensis is a bacterial signature in early-stage bladder cancer that predicts poor patient survival. C_LIO_LIBacteria-derived LPC14:0 acts as a direct ligand for PPAR{delta} to drive host malignant metabolic reprogramming. C_LIO_LITargeting the Staphylococcus lugdunensis-LPC14:0-PPAR{delta} axis abrogates malignant progression in bladder cancer. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.