Back

Population genetics of bumble bee species with diverging population dynamics

Piovesan, A.; Praz, C.; Voelkl, B.; Lanz, S.; Neumann, P.; Beaureapaire, A.

2026-04-17 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.14.716867 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pollinator populations are facing worldwide declines, underscoring conservation needs. Yet, conservation assessments still mostly rely on occurrence data, often derived from heterogeneous and opportunistic observations. While such data can inform on species presence and distribution, they may overlook important markers of population declines. This is particularly problematic for social species such as bumble bees, which typically exhibit low effective population sizes despite high abundance of workers observed in the field. Despite these putative pitfalls, the relationship between occurrence-based and genetic-based estimates remains largely unexplored in social bees. We here investigated spatio-temporal genetic patterns in five Swiss Bombus species representing contrasting population trajectories over the last century: B. humilis and B. sylvarum (stable), B. ruderatus (increasing), B. pomorum (regionally extinct), and B. veteranus (declining). Museum specimens collected between 1929 and 2023 were genotyped at 11 microsatellite loci to compare spatio-temporal fluctuations in genetic diversity and population structure with occurrence data. Overall, multilocus heterozygosity and allelic richness remained stable in all species during the time period investigated, indicating that the diverging population trends did not result in substantial variation of genetic diversity. In contrast, strong and significant shifts in allelic frequencies between time periods were detected in three species, suggesting recent immigration events. Isolation by distance was detected in the cold-adapted B. veteranus, while the extant warm-adapted species (B. humilis, B. sylvarum, B. ruderatus) showed high levels of gene flow between locations. In B. pomorum, increasing genetic homogenization was observed before extinction. Altogether, these findings show that genetic diversity indexes are not the most adapted tools to monitor conservation status of social bee populations, and that estimates of population structure such as allelic shifts may be more informative. Moreover, these results highlight the importance of monitoring metapopulation dynamics and ensuring connectivity among populations to facilitate gene flow and enable demographic rescue processes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.6%
2
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
4
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
11
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
19
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Insect Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
26
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
28
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%