Back

Variation in Haemostasis and VTE Prophylaxis in Elective Adult Cranial Neurosurgery: A Global Survey of Perioperative Practice

Pandit, A. S.; Chaudri, T.; Chaudri, Z.; Vasilica, A. M.; Dhaliwal, J.; Sayar, Z.; Cohen, H.; Westwood, J. P.; Toma, A. K.

2026-04-16 surgery
10.64898/2026.04.14.26350905 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a major cause of perioperative morbidity in cranial neurosurgery, yet clinical practice varies widely, and formal guidelines are inconsistent. Understanding internationally sampled neurosurgical practice is essential for informing consensus and future trials. Methods An international, 2-stage cross-sectional, internet-based survey was conducted. Practising neurosurgeons performing elective adult cranial surgery were eligible. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise practice. Responses covered patterns of pre-operative haemostasis decision making, use and timing of mechanical and/or chemical prophylaxis, use of perioperative imaging prior to anticoagulation, and frequency of clinical assessment for VTE. Associations with geographical income status, subspecialty, and years post-certification were statistically tested. Practice heterogeneity was quantified and contextual influence was summarised using mean effect sizes across stratifying variables in order to determine domains of true equipoise. Results Of 585 responses, 456 (78%) met criteria for inclusion: representing 322 units across 78 countries (71% high-income). Thirteen per cent reported no departmental VTE plan; 23% followed no guidelines and 12% used multiple. Routine pre-operative testing almost universally included haemoglobin/platelets/haematocrit, with fibrinogen more common in high-income settings. Compared with high-income country respondents, low- and middle-income respondents reported higher haemoglobin transfusion thresholds (>90 g/dL; p<0.001) and shorter antiplatelet interruption (p[&le;]0.03), and less frequent outpatient VTE assessment (p<0.001). Mechanical prophylaxis was common (TEDs 81%, IPC 62%), typically started pre- or intra-operatively. Among those completing the chemoprophylaxis section (n=310), 57% required a CT or MRI scan before LMWH which was then initiated on average 31.4 hours after surgery. 1% of respondents did not routinely use LMWH. Many clinical decisions demonstrated statistical equipoise ie. high heterogeneity with low contextual influence. Conclusion Peri-operative haemostasis and VTE prophylaxis practices in adult elective cranial neurosurgery vary substantially worldwide, with some decisions reflecting geographical or socioeconomic differences and many others reflecting true clinical equipoise rather than contextual determinants. By mapping contemporary real-world practice across diverse health-system contexts, this study provides a necessary empirical foundation for rational trial design and future guideline development.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.8%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.3%
4
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
6
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
8
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
13
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
14
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
15
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
16
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
19
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
23
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
28
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%