Back

Center-of-Mass Work Patterns Reveal a Dissociation Between Gait Organization and Limb-level Mechanical Function in Post-stroke Walking

Hosseini-Yazdi, S.-S.; Fitzsimons, K.; Bertram, J. E.

2026-04-16 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.04.14.26350877 medRxiv
Show abstract

Walking speed is widely used to assess gait recovery following stroke, yet it provides limited insight into how walking performance is mechanically organized. This study examined how center-of-mass (COM) work organization and propulsion-support coupling vary across walking speeds in individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis to distinguish recovery of gait organization from recovery of limb-level mechanical function. Eleven individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis performed treadmill walking across speeds ranging from 0.2 to 0.7 m/s while ground-reaction forces were recorded. Limb-specific COM power and work were computed using an individual-limbs framework, and interlimb asymmetry in net and positive work, along with the propulsion-support ratio (PSR), were quantified. A qualitative transition in gait organization was observed: at lower walking speeds, COM power exhibited a simplified two-phase pattern, whereas at higher walking speeds (approximately [≥]0.5 m/s), a structured four-phase COM power pattern emerged, including identifiable push-off and preload phases. Despite this recovery of gait organization, interlimb work asymmetry remained elevated and paretic PSR remained reduced across all speeds, indicating persistent limb-level mechanical deficits. These findings demonstrate that increases in walking speed and the emergence of typical COM power structure reflect recovery of gait organization rather than restoration of underlying limb-level mechanical capacity. Consequently, walking speed alone is insufficient to characterize gait recovery after stroke, and biomechanically informed measures of COM work organization and propulsion-support coupling provide complementary insight by distinguishing organizational recovery from limb-level mechanical recovery.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.