Back

Center-of-Mass Work Patterns Reveal a Dissociation Between Gait Organization and Limb-level Mechanical Function in Post-stroke Walking

Hosseini-Yazdi, S.-S.; Fitzsimons, K.; Bertram, J. E.

2026-04-16 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.04.14.26350877 medRxiv
Show abstract

Walking speed is widely used to assess gait recovery following stroke, yet it provides limited insight into how walking performance is mechanically organized. This study examined how center of mass (COM) work organization and propulsion-support coupling vary across walking speeds in individuals with post stroke hemiparesis to distinguish recovery of gait organization from recovery of limb level mechanical function. Eleven individuals with post stroke hemiparesis performed treadmill walking across speeds ranging from 0.2 to 0.7 m/s while ground reaction forces were recorded. Limb specific COM power and work were computed using an individual limbs framework, and interlimb asymmetry in net and positive work, along with the propulsion-support ratio (PSR), were quantified. A qualitative transition in gait organization was observed: at lower walking speeds, COM power exhibited a simplified two phase pattern, whereas at higher walking speeds (approximately >=0.5 m/s), a structured four phase COM power pattern emerged, including identifiable push off and preload phases. Despite this recovery of gait organization, interlimb work asymmetry remained elevated and paretic PSR remained reduced across all speeds, indicating persistent limb level mechanical deficits. These findings demonstrate that increases in walking speed and the emergence of typical COM power structure reflect recovery of gait organization rather than restoration of underlying limb level mechanical capacity. Consequently, walking speed alone is insufficient to characterize gait recovery after stroke, and biomechanically informed measures of COM work organization and propulsion-support coupling provide complementary insight by distinguishing organizational recovery from limb-level mechanical recovery.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.0%
2
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
4
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
6
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
7
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
9
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
11
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
12
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
13
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
16
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
19
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
23
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%