Meta-analysis of Cannabis Use Identifies Shared Genetic Loci with Sleep and Circadian Rhythms
Valliere, J.; Strausz, S.; Tchio, C.; Risse-Adams, O.; Sinott-Armstrong, N.; Ollila, H. M.; Saxena, R.
Show abstract
Cannabis use is an increasingly common therapeutic for a variety of chronic diseases. In addition, people with sleep problems may self-medicate using cannabis products. However, genetic architecture of cannabis use and its shared genetic predispositions with sleep traits has not been systematically examined. We performed a meta-analysis of cannabis use within the All of Us and UK Biobank cohorts, consisting of 152,807 cases and 220,272 controls. Our meta-analysis identified 39 independent loci, including the previously reported CADM2 locus associated with cannabis use and replicating previous work. Additionally our associations include neuronal and sleep-regulating genes such as HTR1A, RAI1, SLC39A8, and NCAM1. Moreover, tissue-specific analyses revealed that the genetic architecture of cannabis use is heavily enriched within the central nervous system and specific brain cell types. In addition, we observed significant positive genetic correlations with clinical insomnia, insomnia-related medication usage, and objectively measured nighttime physical activity, alongside negative correlations with morningness chronotype and daytime activity. Fine-mapping and colocalization analyses identified shared genetic signals between cannabis use and clinical insomnia including a near-perfect colocalization at SLC39A8 and CADM2. Together, these results highlight the shared genetic risk between cannabis use and sleep disorders. Additionally, our findings indicate the importance of investigating the genetic effects of cannabis use as its use becomes more widespread, both recreationally and medicinally.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging genome-wide data to investigate differences between opioid use vs. opioid dependence in 41,176 individuals from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium 96%
- Genome-wide association study of problematic opioid prescription use in 132,113 23andMe research participants of European ancestry 94%
- Predicting Substance Use Disorders: A Multifactorial Risk Index Combining Clinical, Environmental, and Genetic Risk Factors 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-ancestry genetic investigation of schizophrenia, cannabis use disorder, and tobacco smoking 94%
- Identifying Nootropic Drug Targets via Large-Scale Cognitive GWAS and Transcriptomics 94%
- Cross-disorder genetic analyses implicate dopaminergic signaling as a biological link between Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and obesity measures 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic scores for tobacco use provide insights into systemic health risks in a diverse EHR-linked biobank in Los Angeles 94%
- Neandertal introgression dissects the genetic landscape of neuropsychiatric disorders and associated behavioral phenotypes 93%
- Genomic Influences on Self-Reported Childhood Maltreatment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expanding the Genetic Architecture of Nicotine Dependence and its Shared Genetics with Multiple Traits: Findings from the Nicotine Dependence GenOmics (iNDiGO) Consortium 94%
- Genetic predictors of participation in optional components of UK Biobank 94%
- Genome-wide association analysis of excessive daytime sleepiness identifies 42 loci that suggest phenotypic subgroups 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Correlations between human mating partners: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 22 traits and raw data analysis of 133 traits in the UK Biobank 92%
- Correction for participation bias in the UK Biobank reveals non-negligible impact on genetic associations and downstream analyses 92%
- Alcohol use disorder and body mass index show genetic pleiotropy and shared neural associations 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.