Back

The MIND Study: Design, Feasibility, and Baseline Characteristics of a Smartphone-Based Migraine Cohort

Khorsand, B.; Teichrow, D.; Lipton, R. B.; Ezzati, A.

2026-04-21 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.14.26350866 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo describe the design, feasibility, and baseline characteristics of the Migraine Impact on Neurocognitive Dynamics (MIND) study, a 30-day smartphone-based cohort for high-frequency assessment of cognition and symptoms in adults with migraine. BackgroundCognitive symptoms are an important component of migraine burden, but they are difficult to measure using single-visit testing or retrospective questionnaires. Repeated smartphone-based assessment may better capture real-world variability in cognition and symptoms. MethodsAdults meeting International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria for migraine were enrolled remotely and completed 30 days of once-daily ecological momentary assessments and mobile cognitive tasks delivered through the Mobile Monitoring of Cognitive Change platform. Baseline measures assessed demographics, migraine characteristics, disability, mood, stress, and treatment patterns. Feasibility was evaluated using enrollment, completion, and retention metrics. ResultsA total of 177 participants enrolled (mean age 38.8 {+/-} 11.9 years; 79.7% female), including 80/177 (45.2%) with chronic migraine. Across the 30-day protocol, 3688 daily assessments were completed, representing 70.8% of all possible study days, and 70.6% of participants completed at least 20 days of monitoring. Completion remained above 60% across study days. At baseline, chronic migraine was associated with greater burden than low-frequency and high-frequency episodic migraine, including higher MIDAS scores (98.6 vs. 38.7 and 70.3), more days with concentration difficulty (16.0 vs. 7.9 and 11.5), and more days with functional interference (18.5 vs. 7.6 and 13.0). ConclusionsThe MIND study demonstrates the feasibility of high-frequency smartphone-based assessment of cognition and symptoms in migraine and provides a methodological foundation for future analyses of within-person cognitive and symptom dynamics across the migraine cycle.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
3
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
4
The Journal of Headache and Pain
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
12
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
14
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
19
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
25
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%