Back

From Pixel to Wave: A Geometric Complementary Code for Hierarchical Pixel-Based Morphometry

Marcil, W. A.

2026-04-15 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.13.718311 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This paper introduces a geometric complementary code (GCC) that bridges discrete digital pixel graphics with continuous analog wave mechanics in a geometric morphometrics framework. By oscillating four shaded cubic pixels in a Cartesian grid, an emergent pattern resembling a face-centered cubic (FCC) unit cell lattice appears. This pattern is modeled first in lattice space-- incorporating polarities of the sagittal, transverse, and coronal planes traditionally applied to Cartesian space--and subsequently in Cartesian space as a topographic medium. In the Cartesian model, topographic values divide into rise values, where the grid converges toward elevated features along the Y-axis, and run values, where it flares within terrain dips. This produces a surface grid that undulates like a propagating wave. Across both models, a polar continuum emerges, oscillating between crossed and uncrossed polarities at micro- and macro-grid scales when applied at the topographic tile level. Each tile oscillates to generate counter-oscillatory perspectives across the macro-grid, dynamically shifting between approaching-point and vanishing-point modes. The GCC functions as a hierarchical pixel-based morphometry. It begins with pixel-scale analysis in a single ZX plane, advances to atomic-scale resolution across four ZX planes, and extends to topographic tile-scale across 16 ZX planes. This progression reveals a geometric expansion of FCC patterns within a nested 2x2 matrix processor. Grounded in a consistent Pythagorean grid-count relationship, the framework maps discrete pixel states onto continuous wave-like surface behavior. By addressing limitations in current geometric morphometrics--where 3D scanning and semilandmark methods remain anchored in discrete landmarks or sparse points rather than detailed continuous topographic dimensions--the GCC offers a novel hierarchical bridge between digital and analog domains.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.9%
3
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
5
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
8
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
9
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
10
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
12
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
15
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.0%
20
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
21
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
23
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
27
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
29
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%