Back

The Euler Characteristic Transform Enables Classification of Complex Plant Shapes and Prediction of Leaf Venation from Blade Geometry

Ayub, Y.; McGuire-Scullen, S.; Percival, S.; Weaver, W. N.; Karki, N.; Yahiaoui, W.; Astudillo-Pavon, K.; Barrios, A.; Check, J. C.; Colchado-Lopez, J.; Dolgikh, B. A.; Espinosa-Martinez, D. V.; Fu, Q.; Galvan-Lara, K. M.; Garcia-Chavez, J. N.; Garcia-Rios, S.; Grabb, C. N.; Guadir-Lara, G. E.; Hawkins, J. C.; Hendrickson, C. L.; Hightower, A. T.; Hurtado-Olvera, J. J.; Kianian, S.; Lennon, J.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Lieb, B.; Lin, J.; Lopez-Sanchez, P.; Luna-Alvarez, M.; Martinez-Martinez, C.; Montemayor-Lara, a.; Moreno, N. A.; Obisesan, I. A.; Perez-Flores, O.; Pimentel-Ruiz, C.; Pineda-Hernandez,

2026-04-16 plant biology
10.64898/2026.04.13.718293 bioRxiv
Show abstract

(1) RationaleQuantifying and predicting plant morphology is central to understanding development and evolution, yet many plant forms lack homologous features required for traditional morphometrics. We apply the Euler Characteristic Transform (ECT), an injective descriptor from topological data analysis, to encode 2D plant shapes. The ECT converts contours into image-like representations that preserve shape information while enabling deep learning. (2) MethodsWe computed ECTs for large datasets of leaf and pavement cell shapes and used convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for classification. We also trained CNNs to approximate the inverse mapping, predicting leaf shape masks from radial ECTs. (3) Key resultsECT-based models achieved high classification accuracy, surpassing previous approaches on millions of herbarium-derived leaves. Notably, grapevine leaf venation was predicted from blade geometry alone, demonstrating that vascular structure is encoded in the outline. (4) Main conclusionThe ECT provides a compact, information-preserving representation of biological shape that integrates naturally with deep learning. It enables both accurate classification and predictive reconstruction, revealing latent morphological information and offering new opportunities to study plant form across scales.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.6%
2
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
8
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
13
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
17
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
18
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
20
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
21
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
22
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.6%
27
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%