Back

Bacterial strain structure shapes the trajectory of antibiotic resistance genes from plasmid to chromosome

Guillemet, M.; Lehtinen, S.

2026-04-15 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.13.718102 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The evolutionary dynamics determining whether an antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene resides on a plasmid or a chromosome are critical to understanding the spread of resistance. While theoretical models often predict that beneficial traits should ultimately integrate into the more stable chromosome, contemporary genomic data frequently shows a strong enrichment of resistance genes on mobile, yet costly and less stable plasmids. Here, we propose that the widespread plasmid-mediated resistance observed today may not represent a stable evolutionary equilibrium, but rather a snapshot of an ongoing process. Using a stochastic multi-strain model, we explore the role of strain diversity as a determinant of the timescale of this process. We suggest that the population structure of the bacterial host species, maintained by balancing selection, acts as a substantial barrier to the selective sweep of vertically transmitted chromosomal genes. Because horizontal transmission allows conjugative plasmids to readily cross these strain boundaries, our model indicates that plasmid-borne resistance can transiently dominate the population before chromosomal integration takes over, and that this transient dominance can last for decades. We illustrate these predictions by analysing antimicrobial resistance gene location in three common opportunistic gut pathogens. Furthermore, we show how extending the model to include co-selection between resistance genes on multi-drug resistance plasmids can lead to more complex dynamics that transiently reverse this plasmid-to-chromosome trajectory. Overall, our findings highlight how bacterial population structure can dictate the evolutionary trajectory of beneficial genes, suggesting that the current distribution of AMR genes between chromosome and plasmids is a prolonged transient state rather than a static endpoint.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.9%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.9%
4
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
7
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.9%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.0%
10
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.3%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
13
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
16
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
18
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
23
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
28
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%