Beyond Structure and Affinity: Context-Dependent Signals for de novo Binder Success
Bozkurt, C.
Show abstract
De novo protein binder design has advanced rapidly, yet most designs fail experimentally and current structure- and affinity-centred evaluation does not reliably predict which candidates will succeed. Here we show that biology-informed sequence features, derived from models trained on natural proteins, identify transferable and context-dependent associations with binder expression and binding that are not captured by structural scoring alone. We re-analysed two public benchmarks--the Bits to Binders CAR-T CD20 competition (11,984 designs; expression, proliferation, and T cell function gates) and the Adaptyv EGFR competition (603 designs; expression and binding affinity)--using five biology-informed ML models predicting disorder, amyloidogenicity, topology, PTM sites, and protein classification. Every feature was tested at each gate with FDR-corrected statistics. We identify three layers of signal. Transferable: lower aggregation propensity is the most robust cross-benchmark signal; PTM-site density recurs univariately but is partly length-confounded in EGFR. Architecture-dependent: topology, disorder, and disulfide-related descriptors are significant in both datasets but flip direction, consistent with the different requirements of CAR extracellular domains versus standalone binders. Context-specific: phosphorylation-related associations with CAR-T depletion and low-disorder dominance in EGFR binding are tied to individual assay or format contexts. In the CAR-T benchmark, stacking biology-informed filters raises the enrichment hit rate from 13.8% to 38.6% (2.8x lift) after controlling for known sequence-level predictors. These results suggest that pre-synthesis screening of de novo binders may benefit from being multi-gate and context-aware, using biology-informed sequence descriptors not only to rank candidates but also to help flag likely failure modes earlier and reduce wasted synthesis and testing.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- PLMFit : Benchmarking Transfer Learning with Protein Language Models for Protein Engineering 93%
- ProDualNet: Dual-Target Protein Sequence Design Method Based on Protein Language Model and Structure Model 92%
- Current challenges for epitope-agnostic TCR interaction prediction and a new perspective derived from image classification 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- AbDesign: Database of point mutants of antibodies with associated structures reveals poor generalization of binding predictions from machine learning models. 94%
- AlphaBind, a Domain-Specific Model to Predict and Optimize Antibody-Antigen Binding Affinity 93%
- ASD: Antigen-Specific Antibody Database 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.