Back

SPEAR: Predicting Gene Expression from Single-Cell Chromatin Accessibility

Walter-Angelo, T.; Uzun, Y.

2026-04-14 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.13.717809 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single-cell multiome assays enable direct measurement of chromatin accessibility and gene expression within the same cell. Still, most experimental designs remain constrained to two (and, less commonly, three) modalities per cell. This limitation motivates computational models that can predict unmeasured layers and, simultaneously, help dissect how cis-regulatory accessibility relates to transcription at gene resolution. Existing cross-modal methods often prioritize latent alignment or modality reconstruction, making it difficult to isolate the impact of model inductive bias under a shared cis-regulatory feature definition. We present SPEAR, a configuration-driven framework for gene-centric regression of single-cell gene expression from chromatin accessibility using a fixed transcription-startsite-centered representation shared across model families. Here we show that, under identical features, splits, and evaluation, model performance stratifies reproducibly across two multiome systems (mouse embryonic development and human hemogenic endothelium), with transformer encoders achieving the strongest mean test correlations (0.546 and 0.470, respectively). Per-gene performance distributions reveal substantial heterogeneity in predictability, indicating that accessibility-driven signal is concentrated in a subset of genes across contexts. Shapley value-based feature attribution further localizes predictive signal to promoter-proximal bins, with feature importance decaying with distance from the transcription start site, supporting a promoter-centered regime of cis-regulatory control within the modeled window. Together, these results provide a controlled comparison of inductive biases for chromatin- to-expression prediction and deliver analysis-ready outputs for gene-level interpretation. SPEAR is open source and publicaly available for use at https://github.com/UzunLab/SPEAR. Supplementary data are available.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
18.0%
2
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.9%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
8.1%
4
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
8.1%
5
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.5%
9
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
11
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.3%
12
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
14
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.4%
16
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
17
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
22
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
26
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
29
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%