Sex-biased gene expression shapes sex differences in gene essentiality
Rocca, C.; DeCasien, A. R.
Show abstract
Sex differences in disease incidence and progression are well documented, yet their underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. Multiple models suggest that baseline gene expression levels shape the impact of gene disruption, raising the possibility that sex-biased expression itself contributes to sex differences in cellular vulnerability. Here, we test this hypothesis by integrating sex-biased transcriptomic profiles with large-scale CRISPR loss-of-function screens to determine whether sex-biased expression predicts sex-biased gene essentiality across the genome. We find that gene expression level and sex chromosome dosage each explain a modest fraction of variance in essentiality, with substantially larger effects for sex chromosome genes than for autosomes. Across genes, sex effects on expression and essentiality are small in magnitude but directionally aligned, suggesting that sex differences in transcription can influence functional dependency. To resolve how these relationships arise, we applied gene-level mediation analyses to decompose sex effects on essentiality into expression-mediated and expression-independent components. This approach revealed multiple mechanistic architectures. On autosomes, most genes exhibited either sex-biased essentiality from direct sex effects (independent of expression) or sex-biased expression without functional consequence, while expression-mediated sex differences accounted for a smaller but substantial fraction of genes. In contrast, X chromosome genes were dominated by direct, expression-independent sex differences, consistent with strong effects of sex chromosome dosage, but also showed enrichment of expression-mediated architectures, particularly among X gametologs. Together, our results demonstrate that while sex-biased expression can generate sex-biased gene essentiality, this mechanism is not the default. Instead, sex-biased functional dependency is often driven by direct, expression-independent effects, particularly on the X chromosome, where dosage and compensatory mechanisms play a dominant role.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene essentiality in cancer cell lines is modified by the sex chromosomes 96%
- Post-transcriptional cross- and auto-regulation buffer expression of the human RNA helicases DDX3X and DDX3Y 94%
- Trajectory Mapping of the Early Drosophila Germline Reveals Controls of Zygotic Activation and Sex Determination 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dominance is common in mammals and is associated with trans-acting gene expression and alternative splicing 93%
- Survey of gene, lncRNA and transposon transcription patterns in four mouse organs highlights shared and organ-specific sex-biased regulation 93%
- Allele-specific DNA methylation is increased in cancers and its dense mapping in normal plus neoplastic cells increases the yield of disease-associated regulatory SNPs 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of recent natural selection on genetic loci associated with sexually differentiated human body size and shape phenotypes 94%
- Characterizing the landscape of gene expression variance in humans 94%
- Integrative QTL analysis of gene expression and chromatin accessibility identifies multi-tissue patterns of genetic regulation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.