Back

Modeling Synthetic Audience Reactions to Social-Cognitive Narratives: A Generative GSR Model to Predict Real-World Autonomic Alignment during Film Viewing

Bartling, B. A.; Schmaelzle, R.; Cho, H. J.; Du, Y.

2026-04-17 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.04.13.716763 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While media consumption can be a solitary act, it produces a shared, socially coordinated experience where audiences bodies align in response to shared narrative events that are often social-affective in nature. Despite this recognition, traditional descriptive models of Galvanic skin response (GSR) have existed for decades, yet the socially coordinated aspect remains to be fully reflected in physiological models with the field of communication often treating the underlying generators of autonomic activity as a black box. To bridge this gap, we introduce a computational framework that models the underlying neural driver and its convolution to sweat gland physiology to explain how narrative events translate into measurable conductance. By leveraging multimodal AI models to "interpret" the social-cognitive content of a film, we generated a predictor timeline for a synthetic audience comprised of digital agents (i.e. artificial body systems responding to the film events with GSR responses). We then test this computational audience model by comparing its predictions against an empirical dataset collected as audience members (N = 96) processed the same stimulus, finding that AI-identified social triggers, like moments of comedic violence or shared emotional shifts, significantly predict the GSR time-course of audience engagement. In sum, this paper moves beyond simple and often retrospective labels like "arousal" to offer a computational account of how shared social narratives grip the human nervous system. We provide a scalable and expandable framework and a set of tools to predict media impact and understanding the psychophysiological basis of media.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.4%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.0%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.8%
5
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
9
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
10
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
12
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
13
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
16
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.1%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
23
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%