Back

Multiscale Physical Effects of CpG Methylation on DNA Mechanics, Nucleosome Wrapping, and Chromatin Condensates

Daris, L. C.; Rizvi, A.; Singh, A. A.; Hutchings, J.; Lamers, L. A.; Montabana, E. A.; Kimanius, D.; Banerjee, P. R.; Eeftens, J. M.; Sanulli, S.

2026-04-14 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.04.13.715649 bioRxiv
Show abstract

DNA methylation at CpG dinucleotides is a central epigenetic modification linked to transcriptional repression and heterochromatin formation, yet its physical impact on chromatin organization remains incompletely understood. Here, we integrate single-molecule force spectroscopy, FRAP, and nanorheology to quantify how CpG methylation alters chromatin mechanics across scales. Optical tweezer-based measurements show that CpG methylation modestly increases DNA contour and persistence lengths, indicating a slightly extended and stiffer DNA helix. When assembled into nucleosomes, CpG methylation weakens both outer-and inner turn wrapping, reducing unwrapping forces and per-nucleosome unwrapping energy. On a higher-order assembly scale, although CpG methylated and unmethylated chromatin fibers display similar thresholds for salt-induced phase separation, methylated condensates exhibit markedly reduced internal mobility: FRAP reveals slower chromatin exchange, nanorheology shows increased viscoelasticity and longer relaxation times. Finally, CpG methylation enhances HP1-chromatin interactions, lowering the HP1 concentration required for condensation, despite no change in HP1 binding to naked DNA. Together, these results show that CpG methylation remodels chromatin mechanics by tuning DNA rigidity, nucleosome wrapping energetics, and condensate material properties, providing a multiscale physical framework for how DNA methylation contributes to heterochromatin.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.