Back

The research fatigue and beneficence scale: development and validation in a nationwide cohort of transgender women in the United States and Puerto Rico

Stevenson, M.; Reisner, S.; Pontes, C.; Linton, S.; Borquez, A.; Radix, A.; Schneider, J.; Cooney, E.; Wirtz, A.; ENCORE Study Group,

2026-04-15 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.04.13.26350829 medRxiv
Show abstract

Transgender women are routinely recruited for HIV prevention research and describe feeling over-researched, undervalued, and disconnected from the benefits of research. Research fatigue refers to the adverse impacts of research participation from the volume, frequency, or intensity of research engagement. Research beneficence, an underdeveloped construct, refers to perceptions that research participation is empowering, appreciated, and beneficial to individuals and communities. This study sought to develop and psychometrically evaluate a research fatigue and beneficence scale and examine associations with cohort retention and study procedures among transgender women in the US and Puerto Rico. We developed a novel 7-item measure of research fatigue and beneficence informed by prior literature and qualitative work with transgender women. We assessed internal consistency reliability, factor structure, convergent and divergent validity, and predictive validity with 6-month study retention outcomes and procedures among 2189 transgender women enrolled in a US nationwide cohort (April 2023-December 2024) for the full 7-item research fatigue and beneficence scale, a 4-item research beneficence subscale, and a single-item research fatigue measure. Research beneficence items demonstrated good internal consistency (0.78) and excellent model fit. Research fatigue and beneficence varied by race/ethnicity with participants of color reporting both greater empowerment and greater concerns about community-level benefits. The item "I feel that I am asked to participate in research too frequently" was associated with lower 6-month retention, greater survey missingness, and preference for less invasive HIV testing modalities. Findings highlight multiple dimensions of research experience and the need for reduced participant burden, culturally tailored study designs, and intentional dissemination efforts to improve participant-centered research practices.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.5%
2
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
9
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
10
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
15
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
18
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
19
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
21
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
23
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%