Back

Culture-independent identification and serotyping of Streptococcus pneumoniae by targeted metagenomics in pleural fluid samples

Smith, S. A. M.; Rockett, R. J.; Oftadeh, S.; Tam, K. K.-G.; Payne, M.; Golubchik, T.; Sintchenko, V.

2026-04-16 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.04.13.26350812 medRxiv
Show abstract

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of empyema and pneumonia in children, and monitoring of effectiveness of polyvalent pneumococcal vaccines has been essential for controlling invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in children and elderly adults. Conventional serotyping of pneumococci has relied on Quellung reaction following laboratory culture, however more recently whole genome sequencing (WGS) has been implemented in many reference laboratories to enhance traditional typing. Pleural fluid samples from cases with empyema are often culture negative, limiting the utility of WGS and requiring polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or 16S rRNA sequencing to detect S. pneumoniae. These molecular methods have limited sensitivity and capacity to characterise pneumococcus in clinical samples, especially in specimens with a low pathogen abundance. This study applied capture-based enrichment (tNGS) to identify and characterise S. pneumoniae directly from pleural fluid samples. A total of 51 pleural fluid samples were subjected to tNGS with a custom probe panel, for 39 known positive fluids collected from IPD cases between 2018-2025 in New South Wales, Australia. tNGS results were benchmarked against molecular-based serotyping. Our tNGS achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity in detecting S. pneumoniae. Serotyping results were concordant with PCR and 95% (37/39) of S. pneumoniae PCR positive pleural fluid cases could be serotyped using tNGS. Standard molecular methods however could only determine serotype in 56% (22/39) of samples. This tNGS enabled 39% improvement in ability to directly identify and serotype IPD-associated serotypes of S. pneumoniae in difficult-to-culture pleural fluids can significantly enhance laboratory surveillance of IPD as well as our understanding of vaccine effectiveness.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
4
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
8
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
12
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
20
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
23
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%