Back

Triage Administration of Ondansetron for Gastroenteritis in children; a randomized controlled trial

Weill, O.; Lucas, N.; Bailey, B.; Marquis, C.; Gravel, J.

2026-04-15 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.04.13.26350796 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesAcute gastroenteritis is a leading cause of pediatric emergency department (ED) visits. While ondansetron reduces vomiting, intravenous rehydration, and hospital admissions, its efficacy when initiated at triage remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether triage nurse-initiated administration of ondansetron in children with suspected gastroenteritis reduces the proportion of patients requiring observation following initial physician assessment. MethodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in a tertiary pediatric ED in Canada. Children aged 6 months to 17 years presenting with morae than 3 episodes of vomiting in the preceding 24 hours (including 1 within 2 hours of arrival), were eligible. At triage, we randomized participants to receive liquid ondansetron or a color- and taste-matched placebo. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients requiring observation after the first physician evaluation. Secondary outcomes included post-intervention vomiting, ED length of stay, patient comfort, and 48-hour return visits. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03052361). ResultsRecruitment was stopped prematurely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ninety-one participants were randomized to ondansetron (n= 44) or placebo (n= 47). Overall, 40 patients (45%) were discharged immediately after the initial physician assessment, with no difference between the ondansetron and placebo groups (44% vs. 45%; absolute difference -1%, 95% CI: -20% to 19%). No significant differences were observed in all secondary outcomes. ConclusionIn this trial, triage nurse-initiated ondansetron administration did not reduce the need for ED observation in children with presumed gastroenteritis. While being underpowered, this study could inform researchers planning larger clinical trials.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.