Back

Deep-learning-Assisted Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Evaluation for Pre-transplant Human Liver Graft Quality and Transplant Suitability

Zhang, Q.; Tang, Q.; Vu, T.; Pandit, K.; Cui, Y.; Yan, F.; Wang, N.; Li, J.; Yao, A.; Menozzi, L.; Fung, K.-M.; Yu, Z.; Parrack, P.; Ali, W.; Liu, R.; Wang, C.; Liu, J.; Hostetler, C. A.; Milam, A. N.; Nave, B.; Squires, R. A.; Battula, N. R.; Pan, C.; Martins, P. N.; Yao, J.

2026-04-15 transplantation
10.64898/2026.04.13.26350786 medRxiv
Show abstract

End-stage liver disease (ESLD) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Currently, the only curative option for patients with ESLD is liver transplantation. However, the demand for donor livers far exceeds the available supply, partly because many potentially viable livers are discarded following biopsy evaluation. While biopsy is the gold standard for assessing liver histological features related to graft quality and transplant suitability, it often leads to high discard rates due to its susceptibility to sampling errors and limited spatial coverage. Besides, biopsy is invasive, time-consuming, and unavailable in clinical facilities with limited resources. Here, we present an AI-assisted photoacoustic/ultrasound (PA/US) imaging framework for quantitative assessment of human donor liver graft quality and transplant suitablity at the whole-organ scale. With multimodal volumetric PA/US images as the input, our deep-learning (DL) model accurately predicted the risk level of fibrosis and steatosis, which indicate the graft quality and transplant suitability, when comparing with true pathological scores. DL also identified the imaging modes (PAI wavelength and B-mode USI) that correlated the most with prediction accuracy, without relying on ill-posed spectral unmixing. Our method was evaluated in six discarded human donor livers comprising sixty spatially matched regions of interest. Our study will pave the way for a new standard of care in organ graft quality and transplant suitability that is fast, noninvasive, and spatially thorough to prevent unnecessary organ discards in liver transplantation.

Matching journals

The top 15 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.4%
3
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.2%
8
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
9
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
16
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
18
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
20
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
21
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
24
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
25
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
27
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
30
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%