Back

Genetic analysis of female genital tract polyps implicates genome stability, estrogen signalling and shared susceptibility with proliferative gynaecological disorders

Ingold, N.; Frankcombe, S.; Bouttle, K.; Moro, E.; Canson, D.; Zoellner, S.; Patil, S.; Dzigurski, J.; Glubb, D. M.; Laisk, T.; O'Mara, T. A.

2026-04-16 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.04.13.26350740 medRxiv
Show abstract

Female genital tract (FGT) polyps are common benign growths affecting up to half of all women. However, they carry malignant potential, and their genetic architecture remains poorly defined. We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis across four biobanks (48,400 cases, 477,134 controls), identifying 26 risk loci for FGT polyps, 12 of which were previously unreported. Integrative gene prioritisation highlighted 193 candidate genes, revealing a potential convergent biological mechanism: where germline variation in DNA replication and maintenance (e.g., PRIM1, TERT and HMGA1) compromises genomic stability in the context of hormone-driven proliferation (e.g., ESR1 and GREB1). This susceptibility is further modulated by metabolic drivers of estrogen biosynthesis, underscored by specific adiposity-related loci (e.g. RSPO3 and PLCE1) and the aromatase gene CYP19A1. Mendelian randomisation demonstrated bidirectional causal relationships with endometriosis and fibroids, and endometrial cancer. Leveraging the shared genetic architecture of FGT polyps and other gynaecological disorders via multi-trait analysis revealed an additional 26 loci, validating sub-threshold regions encompassing HMGA1 and GREB1. In total, 52 risk loci were identified (36 novel), 39 of which replicated in an independent cohort. These findings reframe polyps not merely as local gynaecological overgrowths but as manifestations of a systemic proliferative syndrome characterised by dysregulated genome stability and estrogen signalling, which may also impact malignant transformation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.