Back

Genetic analysis of female genital tract polyps implicates genome stability, estrogen signalling and shared susceptibility with proliferative gynaecological disorders

Ingold, N.; Frankcombe, S.; Bouttle, K.; Moro, E.; Canson, D.; Zoellner, S.; Patil, S.; Dzigurski, J.; Glubb, D. M.; Laisk, T.; O'Mara, T. A.

2026-04-16 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.04.13.26350740 medRxiv
Show abstract

Female genital tract (FGT) polyps are common benign growths affecting up to half of all women. However, they carry malignant potential, and their genetic architecture remains poorly defined. We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis across four biobanks (48,400 cases, 477,134 controls), identifying 26 risk loci for FGT polyps, 12 of which were previously unreported. Integrative gene prioritisation highlighted 193 candidate genes, revealing a potential convergent biological mechanism: where germline variation in DNA replication and maintenance (e.g., PRIM1, TERT and HMGA1) compromises genomic stability in the context of hormone-driven proliferation (e.g., ESR1 and GREB1). This susceptibility is further modulated by metabolic drivers of estrogen biosynthesis, underscored by specific adiposity-related loci (e.g. RSPO3 and PLCE1) and the aromatase gene CYP19A1. Mendelian randomisation demonstrated bidirectional causal relationships with endometriosis and fibroids, and endometrial cancer. Leveraging the shared genetic architecture of FGT polyps and other gynaecological disorders via multi-trait analysis revealed an additional 26 loci, validating sub-threshold regions encompassing HMGA1 and GREB1. In total, 52 risk loci were identified (36 novel), 39 of which replicated in an independent cohort. These findings reframe polyps not merely as local gynaecological overgrowths but as manifestations of a systemic proliferative syndrome characterised by dysregulated genome stability and estrogen signalling, which may also impact malignant transformation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
22.9%
2
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
7.3%
3
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
4
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
6
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
9
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
11
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.9%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.8%
14
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.4%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
24
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
25
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
27
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
30
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.5%