Back

Strategies to enroll and retain low-income adolescent and young adult pregnant women in longitudinal studies: lessons learned from the AMOR project

Camara, S. M. A.; de Souza Barbosa, J. F.; Hipp, S.; Fernandes Macedo, S. G. G.; Sentell, T.; Bassani, D. G.; Domingues, M. R.; Pirkle, C. M.

2026-04-17 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.13.26350540 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundProspective studies of pregnant adolescents are essencial to effectively address this global health priority. They help answer vital questions about their health, but such studies are uncommon due to the difficulty in retaining adolescents. This paper describes the successes and challenges of the research strategies used to ensure sufficient recruitment and retention of pregnant adolescents in a longitudinal study about adolescent childbearing in an under-resourced setting. MethodsThe Adolescence and Motherhood Research project was conducted in a rural region of Northeast Brazil in 2017-2019 and assessed 50 primigravids between 13-18 years (adolescents) and 50 primigravids between 23-28 years (young adults) during the first 16 weeks of pregnancy with two follow-ups (third trimester of pregnancy, and 4-6 weeks postpartum). Recruitment strategies involved engagement of health sector and community, as well as referrals from health care professionals and dissemination of the project in different locations. Retention strategies included maintaining contact with the participants between assessments and providing transportation for them to attend the follow-up procedures. ResultsRecruitment took 10 months to complete. A total of 78% of the participants were recruited from the primary health care units, mainly after referral from a health care provider. Retention reached 95% of the sample throughout the study (90%: adolescents; 98%: adults). ConclusionA combination of approaches is necessary to successfully recruit and retain youth in longitudinal studies and engaging local stakeholders may help to increase community-perceived legitimacy of the research. Working closely with front-line staff is essential when conducting research in rural low-income communities.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.9%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
13.0%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
7
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
11
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
13
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
14
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
23
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
24
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%