Back

The Peripheral Use of Low-dose Vasopressors for Safety and Efficacy (PULSE) in the intensive care unit: a prospective, unblinded feasibility study protocol

Wiseman, J.; Sibley, S.; Perez-Patrigeon, S.; Mekhaeil, M.; Hanley, M.; Hunt, M.; Boyd, T.; Grant, B.; Boyd, J. G.

2026-04-20 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.04.13.26349750 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThere is increasing interest in the peripheral administration of vasopressors for two main reasons: (1) to expedite vasopressor initiation in patients with refractory shock and (2) to avoid the potential complications associated with central venous catheter placement. The current evidence on the use of peripheral vasopressor administration is primarily based on single-center observational studies. There are inconsistencies in the administration of peripheral vasopressors, including catheter gauge and location, monitoring practices, vasopressor concentrations, and duration of use. This has made it difficult for institutions to develop best practice guidelines. A randomized controlled trial is needed to address this knowledge gap. Methods and analysisThe Peripheral Use of Low-dose Vasopressors for Safety and Efficacy (PULSE) in the intensive care unit is a prospective, unblinded feasibility study. Eligible patients will be 18 years or older, have no existing central venous catheter or peripherally inserted central catheter and have the presence of shock requiring a minimum vasopressor dose of any of the following: norepinephrine 0.0625 mcg/kg/min, phenylephrine 0.625 mcg/kg/min, and epinephrine 0.0625 mcg/kg/min. Fifty patients will be randomized 1:1 into either the peripheral venous catheter or central venous catheter group. The primary outcome is feasibility, defined as (1) a recruitment rate of 4 participants per month, (2) a data capture rate of [&ge;]90%, and (3) a <50% conversion rate from peripheral to central access. The secondary outcomes include the safety of peripheral vasopressor use, alive and central-line-free days, the number of attempts needed to place a catheter, volume status, in-hospital mortality rate, ICU and hospital length of stay, and patient-centred important outcomes. ImplicationsThe data collected from this study will inform the design of a definitive randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of protocol-driven peripheral vasopressor administration. Ethics and disseminationThis study received approval (6042888) from the Queens University Health Sciences/Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Boards. Results of this study will be presented at critical care conferences and submitted for publication. Trial registration numberNCT06920173 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06920173).

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
22.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
8
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
9
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
11
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
12
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
13
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
14
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
15
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
16
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
19
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
20
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
21
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%