Back

Multifractal Fluctuations in Electrogram Dynamics Distinguish Atrial Fibrillation Phenotype, Drug Response, and Imminent Termination: Implications for Mechanism and Treatment.

Chapman, D. G.; Ganesan, A. N.; Strong, C.; Tonchev, I.; Lorensini, S.; Shahrbabaki, S. S.

2026-04-15 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.12.718068 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSAtrial fibrillation (AF) is maintained by complex dynamics, clinically characterised by bursting periods of organization and disorganization in intracardiac electrograms. We have previously postulated that cardiac conduction behaves like a critical system, where phase shift from organised rhythm to AF is a phase transition at the critical point. We thus hypothesized that using multifractal analysis of AF electrograms could potentially quantify non-stationary fluctuations, revealing novel mechanistic insights into the cardiac critical system and examine potential clinically relevant markers of AF dynamics, phenotype and treatment response. ObjectivesTo determine whether multifractal analysis of AF electrograms can (i) Distinguish paroxysmal (PAF0 and non-paroxysmal AF (NPAF), (ii) predict response to pharmacologic modulation, and (iii) identify imminent spontaneous termination, thereby acting as marker of proximity to criticality along complex system phase spectrum. MethodsWe analysed >1.4 million seconds of high-density bipolar electrograms from 106 patients (paroxysmal n{approx}52, non-paroxysmal n{approx}54) undergoing left atrial mapping with a 24-bipole HD-Grid catheter at standardized sites (RENEWAL AF-ANZCTR ACTRN12619001172190)). Multifractal analysis using the Wavelet Transform Modulus Maxima Method (WTMM) was applied to a burst-energy observable to derive log-normal multifractal parameters c (support dimension), c (spectrum location), and c2 (fluctuations). Hierarchical mixed-effects models accounted for channels nested within locations within patients. A flecainide sub-study (n=15) provided paired pre-/post-infusion recordings, and 27 spontaneous termination events in 15 patients were analysed using 60-s pre-termination windows. Spatial texture of c2 was quantified by variogram-derived correlation length and sill. ResultsAF electrograms exhibited robust multifractality confirming multifractal fluctuations as an intrinsic property of AF. Non-paroxysmal AF showed significantly reduced fluctuations versus paroxysmal AF (c2: {beta}=-0.01, p=0.001), indicating a paradoxical loss of fluctuations with disease progression. Flecainide selectively increased fluctuations in paroxysmal AF ({Delta}c2 = +0.04, p<0.01; {Delta}c = +0.06, p<0.01) but had no significant effect on fluctuations (c2) in non-paroxysmal AF, revealing phenotype-dependent drug response. Immediately prior to spontaneous AF termination, fluctuations increased significantly compared with sustained AF (c2: 0.198 vs 0.181, p=0.024). Spatial variogram analysis revealed heterogenous patterns in paroxysmal AF, whereas non-paroxysmal AF displayed a homogenised, flattened fluctuations landscape. ConclusionsAtrial fibrillation exhibits robust multifractal dynamics rather than random electrical activity. Reduced fluctuations characterizes non-paroxysmal AF, whereas higher fluctuations is observed in paroxysmal AF, during flecainide modulation, and immediately prior to spontaneous termination. These findings suggest that multifractal fluctuations (c2) reflects the dynamical state of AF and may serve as a quantitative biomarker of disease progression, pharmacologic responsiveness, and proximity to termination. CONDENSED ABSTRACTTAtrial fibrillation (AF) exhibits multifractal electrogram fluctuations that vary with disease stage, pharmacologic responsiveness, and proximity to spontaneous termination. In this study, multifractal fluctuations (c2) was higher in paroxysmal than non-paroxysmal AF, increased selectively with flecainide in paroxysmal AF, and rose immediately before spontaneous termination. These findings identify c2 as a quantitative marker of AF progression, and imminent reorganization. Clinically, multifractal analysis may enhance intra-procedural assessment of AF phenotype, guide drug selection, and improve recognition of transitions toward sinus rhythm, and connects AF with concepts of criticality and phase transitions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
19.3%
2
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.7%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.1%
5
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
2.0%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
13
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
15
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
19
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
28
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%