Back

Optimizing data quality and completeness in visual proteomics experiments

Dobbs, J. M.; Mahamid, J.

2026-04-14 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.04.12.717927 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) is fast developing from a tool primarily used to investigate structures of individual macromolecular complexes in situ into a high-resolution probe for molecular processes within diverse functional contexts in intact cells. It is thus increasingly necessary that the data are analyzed and quantified as completely as possible. But annotating and structurally characterizing macromolecular complexes with a high degree of completeness is a significant challenge, especially for smaller molecular targets. In particular, it is difficult to avoid incomplete localizations of complexes, false identifications, or losses during computational classification. To address these issues, we assessed parameters in data processing, including the role of voxel size in template matching, the effects of Volta phase plate imaging on localization, classification, and map refinement, and the extent to which multi-particle-based refinement of tiltseries improves these data processing steps. Our analyses provide practical guidelines that help maximize completeness in cellular cryo-ET data; accurate description of the sample is crucial for visual proteomics experiments, and these optimizations help ensure that data annotation and analysis are comprehensive.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.4%
3
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.7%
4
Journal of Structural Biology: X
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
8
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.2%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
10
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
13
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
14
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
20
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
23
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
25
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
26
Molecular Omics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%