Back

Distinct Control States Underlie Voluntary Task Switching: Evidence for Capacity-Dependent Control Modes

PARK, H.-B.; Rosenberg, M. D.; Vogel, E. K.

2026-04-15 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.12.716959 bioRxiv
Show abstract

People often switch tasks when attention wanes or an alternative task becomes more appealing. Such choices may reflect different control modes that may vary with working memory (WM) capacity. This study tested whether momentary attentional lapses prospectively predict voluntarily task switching and whether this relationship depends on WM capacity. Participants performed a continuous performance task involving face and scene images, with blocks in which they either freely chose the next task or followed an externally imposed sequence. A clear capacity-dependent crossover emerged where individuals with lower capacity were more likely to switch following lapse-prone blocks, whereas higher-capacity individuals tended to switch from relatively well-focused states. Eye-tracking revealed greater bias toward the competing irrelevant category before switches in lower-capacity individuals, accompanied by early conflict-related pupil dilation. Externally imposed task sequencing selectively reduced lapses in the lower-capacity group without affecting higher-capacity performance, suggesting that external structure can scaffold weaker internal goal maintenance. These findings suggest that the relationship between lapses and voluntary switching varies with WM capacity rather than being uniform across individuals. This pattern is consistent with a goal-competition account in which lapses reflect shifts in the balance between competing task goals, and voluntary switches may be preceded by different control states.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
21.9%
2
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.6%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.2%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
8
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
11
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
12
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
14
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
15
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
17
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
21
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
23
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.6%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%
28
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%