Back

An unrecognized host response to microbial exposure resets circadian timing

Mo, D.; Lam, T.; Baker, E.; Fraser, O. P.; Dorling, J.; O'Neill, J. S.; van Ooijen, G.; Dodd, A. N.; Partch, C. L.; Crosby, P.; Kimmey, J. M.

2026-04-14 cell biology
10.64898/2026.04.11.717924 bioRxiv
Show abstract

As ubiquitous features of every natural environment, microbes have profoundly shaped eukaryotic biology throughout evolution. Circadian clocks evolved in all domains of life as central regulators that align physiology with environmental cycles, yet whether they respond directly to microbial signals remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that evolutionarily diverse microbes potently reset mammalian cellular clocks and can drive phase shifts in plants and algae, indicating cross-kingdom effects of microbes on circadian rhythms. In mammals, exposure to soluble bacterial components distinct from canonical innate immune ligands induces acute PER2 upregulation independently of Bmal1 or nascent transcription. A targeted inhibitor screen and biochemical assays implicate p38 MAPK as a modulator of this response. Taken together, this positions bacterial exposure as a previously unrecognized circadian clock input, revealing a new axis of host-microbe interaction that modulates biological timing at the cellular level.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.2%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.5%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Cell Biology
○ 118 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
236 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.1%
6
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Molecular Cell
○ 350 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 13%
4.0%
9
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
10
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.7%
11
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.7%
12
Nature Chemical Biology
○ 119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
13
Nature Metabolism
○ 69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
14
Cell Systems
○ 201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Developmental Cell
○ 196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
17
Nature Microbiology
○ 155 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
The EMBO Journal
○ 309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Nature Neuroscience
○ 252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.1%
21
Cell Stem Cell
○ 62 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Nature Aging
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Nature Plants
○ 94 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.