Back

Latent Gaussian Process Modeling for Dynamic PET Data: A Hierarchical Extension of the Simplified Reference Tissue Model

Vegelius, J.

2026-04-16 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.11.717906 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) provides a powerful tool for studying in vivo neurochemical processes, including transient neurotransmitter release. However, widely used models such as the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) assume time-invariant kinetic parameters, limiting their ability to capture dynamic changes in binding. Existing extensions introduce time-varying effects through parametric response functions or basis expansions, but are often constrained by restrictive functional assumptions, computational complexity, or limited uncertainty quantification. We propose a latent Gaussian process extension of SRTM (LGPE-SRTM), in which the apparent efflux parameter is modeled as a smooth, time-varying function within a hierarchical framework. By applying a first-order implicit discretization of the governing differential equation, the model admits a representation that is linear in all kinetic parameters in the mean structure, while nonlinearity is confined to a parameter-dependent covariance. This yields a conditionally linear mixed-effects model with structured covariance, enabling efficient likelihood-based inference. The proposed approach integrates mechanistic modeling, nonparametric flexibility, and hierarchical inference in a unified and computationally scalable framework. By representing functional effects on a shared temporal domain, all core computations reduce to operations on low-dimensional matrices whose size is independent of the number of subjects. This enables robust population-level inference on timevarying neurotransmitter dynamics without imposing restrictive parametric forms. The method is demonstrated on both simulated and empirical PET data, where it accurately recovers transient effects, provides well-calibrated uncertainty, and distinguishes constant from time-varying dynamics.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.8%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.2%
3
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
5
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
6
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
10
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
11
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
13
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
24
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.5%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%