Back

Mechanistic Insights into Skin Sympathetic Nerve Activity Dynamics in Healthy Subjects Through a Two-Layer Signal-Analytical and Closed-Loop Physiological Modeling Framework

Lin, R.; Halfwerk, F. R.; Donker, D. W.; Tertoolen, J.; van der Pas, V. R.; Laverman, G. D.; Wang, Y.

2026-04-13 health informatics
10.64898/2026.04.11.26350680 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: Skin sympathetic nerve activity (SKNA) has emerged as a promising non-invasive surrogate measure of sympathetic drive, but its relevant physiological characteristics remain ill-defined. This observational study aims to investigate its regulatory patterns during rest and Valsalva maneuver (VM) in healthy participants. Method: Using a two-layer strategy integrating signal analysis and physiological modelling, we analyzed data recorded from 41 subjects performing repeated VMs. The observational layer includes time-domain feature comparisons using linear mixed-effect models, and time-varying spectral coherence analysis. The mechanistic layer proposes a mathematical model to investigate whether baroreflex and respiratory modulation are sufficient to reproduce the observed HR and average SKNA (aSKNA) dynamics. Main Results: Mean integrated SKNA (iSKNA) showed more significant change than HRV for VM induced effects. We also found mean iSKNA increase during VM varies with BMI and sex. The coherence analysis indicated that iSKNA strongly synchronized with EDR under resting conditions. The proposed model successfully reproduced main characteristics of aSKNA dynamics, yielding a high median Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.80 ([Q1, Q3] = [0.60, 0.91]). In contrast, HR dynamics were only partially captured, with a median PCC of 0.37 ([Q1, Q3] = [0.16, 0.55]). These results likely suggest SKNA provides a more direct representation of sympathetic burst dynamics during VM in healthy subjects. Significance: This study provides convergent evidence that SKNA reflects known autonomic regulatory influences in healthy subjects. These findings strengthen the physiological interpretability of SKNA while clarifying its appropriate use as a practical biomarker of sympathetic function.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.6%
2
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
4
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
6
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
9
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
12
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
14
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
15
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
18
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
21
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
22
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
24
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%