Back

Invasive cervical cancers after an HPV-negative test: insights from screening histories

Hassan, S. S.; Nordqvist-Kleppe, S.; Asinger, N.; Wang, J.; Dillner, J.; Arroyo Muhr, L. S.

2026-04-13 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.11.26350679 medRxiv
Show abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is the primary method for cervical cancer screening, and a negative HPV test is associated with a very low subsequent risk of invasive cancer. Nevertheless, a small number of cervical cancers are diagnosed following an HPV-negative testing result, posing challenges within HPV-based screening pathways. Using nationwide Swedish registry data of HPV testing, we identified women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer between 2019 and 2024 and reconstructed HPV testing histories from the National Cervical Screening Registry (NKCx). The most recent HPV test prior to diagnosis was defined as the index test, and longitudinal HPV testing trajectories were classified among women with an HPV-negative index test. Of 3,000 women diagnosed with invasive cancer, 243 (8.1%) had an HPV-negative index test. These women were older at diagnosis and more frequently diagnosed at advanced stages compared with women with an HPV-positive index test. Most HPV-negative index tests (66.3%) were performed in the peri-diagnostic period (+/- 30 days). Among women with an HPV-negative index test, 52.7% (128/243) had no prior HPV testing recorded, while the remainder had consistently HPV-negative histories (33.3%, 83/243) or evidence of prior HPV positivity before the index negative test (14%, 32/243). Possible recurrent HPV positivity following an intervening negative test was rare (0.4%, 1/243). HPV-negative screening results preceding invasive cancer reflect heterogeneous screening histories and cannot be explained solely by test failure. Findings highlighting the importance of reaching women earlier in screening programs and show that fluctuating HPV detectability is rare.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
4
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
7
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
8
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
12
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
13
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
14
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
16
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
17
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
19
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
21
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
22
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%