Back

Prospective Population-Scale Validation of an Electronic Health Record Based Model for Pancreatic Cancer Risk

Lahtinen, E.; Schigiltchoff, N.; Jia, K.; Kundrot, S.; Palchuk, M. B.; Warnick, J.; Chan, L.; Shigiltchoff, N.; Sawhney, M. S.; Rinard, M.; Appelbaum, L.

2026-04-13 oncology
10.64898/2026.04.11.26350318 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and aims: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) surveillance is limited to individuals with familial or genetic risk although most future cases arise outside these groups. In a retrospective study, PRISM, an electronic health record (EHR)-based PDAC risk model, identified individuals in the general population at elevated near-term risk of PDAC. We aimed to prospectively evaluate whether PRISM can identify high-risk individuals beyond current surveillance groups across U.S. health systems. Methods: We performed a prospective multicenter cohort study after deployment of PRISM in April 2023 across 44 U.S. health care organizations. Eligible adults aged [≥]40 years without prior PDAC received a single baseline risk score and were assigned to prespecified risk tiers. Patients were followed for incident PDAC for 30 months. We estimated tier-specific 30-month cumulative incidence (positive predictive value, PPV), number needed to screen (NNS), standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), and time from deployment and first high-risk flag to diagnosis. Results: Among 6,282,123 adults assigned a PRISM score, 5,058,067 had follow-up; 3,609 developed PDAC. The highest-risk tier had 30-fold higher PDAC incidence than the study population. At the SIR 5 threshold, 30-month cumulative incidence was 0.35% (NNS, 284.2); at SIR 16, 1.14% (NNS, 87.4); and at SIR 30, 2.19% (NNS, 45.7). Median time from deployment to PDAC diagnosis was 9.5 months, and median time from first high-risk flag to diagnosis at SIR 5 was 3.5 years. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analyses supported patient- and tier-level interpretability. Conclusions: Prospective deployment of PRISM across multiple U.S. health care organizations identified individuals at elevated near-term risk for PDAC, with substantial risk enrichment and lead time before diagnosis. These findings support the real-world scalability and generalizability of EHRbased risk stratification for risk-adapted early detection. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05973331

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
2
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
3
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
6
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
8
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
9
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
14
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
15
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
17
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
18
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
19
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
21
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
22
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
24
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
25
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
26
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
27
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
28
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
29
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%