EVEE: Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model embeddings
Pearce, M. T.; Dooms, T.; Yamamoto, R.; Meehl, J.; Molnar, C.; Bissell, M.; Hazra, D.; Fang, C.; Nguyen, N.; Anderson, M.; Osborne, C.; Duffy, P.; Toomey, B.; Klee, E.; Myasoedova, E.; Ryu, A.; Ayanian, S.; Korfiatis, P.; Redlon, M.; Jain, A.; Balsam, D.; Wang, N. K.
Show abstract
Predicting the clinical significance of genetic variants remains a central challenge in genomic medicine, with most observed variants classified as variants of uncertain significance. Here we show that representations from Evo 2, a 7-billion-parameter genomic foundation model, support accurate and interpretable pathogenicity prediction across variant types from a single framework. An embedding-based classifier, or "probe", trained on Evo 2 embeddings achieves state-of-the-art performance across single nucleotide variant consequence types (0.997 overall AUROC on 833k ClinVar variants) and generalizes zero-shot to indels (0.991 AUROC), outperforming bioinformatic meta-predictors, protein models, and existing foundation model approaches. Performance is robust across conservation levels and transfers to deep mutational scanning datasets for BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, and LDLR. To make these predictions interpretable, we train supervised annotation probes to quantify predicted disruptions caused by each variant, then synthesize these disruption profiles into natural language explanations using a frontier reasoning model. We provide pre-computed predictions and on-demand explanations for all 4.2 million ClinVar variants through the Evo Variant Effect Explorer (EVEE), an interactive web resource for the community. This work establishes that representations from genomic foundation models can serve as a unified substrate for both accurate variant effect prediction and mechanistic interpretation, reframing interpretability in computational genomics from a trade-off into a complementary product of learned biological structure.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Nucleotide Transformer: Building and Evaluating Robust Foundation Models for Human Genomics 97%
- Decoding sequence determinants of gene expression in diverse cellular and disease states 95%
- Inferring allele-specific copy number aberrations and tumor phylogeography from spatially resolved transcriptomics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing the allele- and haplotype-specific copy number landscape of cancer genomes at single-cell resolution with CHISEL 95%
- Deaminase-assisted single-molecule and single-cell chromatin fiber sequencing 94%
- Haplotype-enhanced inference of somatic copy number profiles from single-cell transcriptomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- ProSolo: Accurate Variant Calling from Single Cell DNA Sequencing Data 95%
- Leveraging supervised learning for functionally-informed fine-mapping of cis-eQTLs identifies an additional 20,913 putative causal eQTLs 95%
- A probabilistic graphical model for estimating selection coefficient of nonsynonymous variants from human population sequence data 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.