Back

A Scalable High-Density Microwell Assay for Single-Cell Clonal Expansion Profiling

Stefanius, K.; Raut, S.; Presley, B.; Dave, D. P.

2026-04-14 cell biology
10.64898/2026.04.10.717842 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Traditional clonogenic assays remain central to evaluating the self-renewal capacity of tumor cells. However, the assay relies on subjective endpoint measurements, is restricted to two-dimensional monolayer growth, and lacks the single cell resolution required to resolve heterogeneous expansion behaviors. We describe a high-density microwell array-based platform for quantitative assessment of single cell clonogenic growth outcomes, defined by cell count distributions spanning non-dividing, slow-dividing, and fast-dividing three-dimensional colony forming phenotypes. This approach links initial single-cell occupancy to defined growth outcomes across thousands of indexed microwells per well. The platform integrates high-density, low-adhesion microwell arrays within industry standard device plate formats and an automated image analysis pipeline incorporating machine learning, enabling parallel quantification of spatially indexed founder-derived microwells using widely accessible automated imaging systems. The assay was implemented in both 4-well and 96-well plate formats to evaluate reproducibility and scalability across different plate configurations. Using three glioblastoma cell lines as model systems, we demonstrate reproducible single founder occupancy and consistent clonal growth outcome distributions across replicate formats. This integrated microscale assay platform enables systematic quantitative characterization of clonogenic expansion capacity at single cell resolution and is compatible with applications in cancer biology, therapeutic testing, and functional single cell phenotyping. By resolving single-cell persistence, limited expansion and high expansion outcomes within a scalable high-density format, this approach expands the analytical resolution of single cell clonogenic profiling beyond traditional binary colony scoring.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 7%
17.8%
2
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.9%
6
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
7
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
12
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
16
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
19
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
27
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 49%
0.5%