Back

Impact of Fluorophore and Epitope Position on Destabilized Reporter Performance in C. elegans

Jackson, A.; Ragle, J. M.; Ward, J. D.

2026-04-10 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.04.10.717803 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Determining spatial and temporal gene expression is crucial for understanding animal development and physiology. Promoter reporters are powerful tools used to dissect how cis-regulatory elements and trans-acting factors control gene expression. Many fluorescent proteins used in promoter reporters, however, have long half-lives (>24 hr) which limit the study of dynamic expression. Destabilizing sequences like PEST reduce the half-life of reporter proteins to provide a more representative readout of gene expression. mlt-11 is a putative protease inhibitor known to oscillate in expression at the mRNA and protein level, yet a mlt-11p::mNeonGreen::3xFLAG::PEST::tbb-2 3UTR promoter reporter did not detectably oscillate. We systematically dissected this transgene, finding that placement of a 3xFLAG tag adjacent to a PEST sequence severely hampered oscillatory expression of a mNeonGreen promoter reporter. Surprisingly, reporter designs that effectively oscillate with a GFP or mNeonGreen fluorophore fail to oscillate when mStayGold is used, with these reporters remaining detectable over 24 hours following promoter inactivation. In addition, other tested epitopes (Myc, ALFA, OLLAS) did not hamper PEST-dependent destabilization but led to varying levels of reporter expression. This study details key considerations for designing destabilized fluorescent promoter reporters.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
4
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.2%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
6
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.3%
7
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.1%
11
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
13
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
15
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Journal of Bacteriology
190 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
23
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
25
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
29
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%