Back

Memory reactivation during sleep promotes structure abstraction

Solomon, S. H.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Siefert, E. M.; Gonciulea, C. M.; Schapiro, A. C.

2026-04-11 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.10.717748 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We readily detect structure in our environments, which in turn guides future learning. Disentangling this structure from the superficial features of a specific learning environment provides an especially strong basis for future generalization, but it remains unclear when and how this kind of abstraction occurs. Memory reactivation during sleep has been hypothesized to support such abstraction, but this has yet to be directly tested. Here we examined this hypothesis by teaching participants novel categories in which patterns of feature covariation were governed by different graph structures. Participants then learned a new category, defined by entirely different features, whose structure was either congruent or incongruent with a previously learned category. If structural knowledge is abstracted away from superficial features, it should facilitate transfer when structures are congruent. In Experiment 1, when two categories were learned in immediate succession, participants showed no transfer benefit, suggesting that structure understanding remained tied to the original features. In Experiment 2, we tested whether offline processing promotes abstraction. Participants either remained awake between learning phases spaced 3 hours apart, or took a nap during which a previously learned category was reactivated using targeted memory reactivation (TMR). Transfer benefits emerged only when the reactivated and target categories shared the same structure, and these benefits increased with the number of cues presented during slow-wave sleep. These findings provide the first direct evidence that memory reactivation during sleep promotes the abstraction of structure, enabling knowledge to transfer across learning episodes with no overlap in features.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
22.7%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 9%
14.9%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.2%
4
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
7
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.9%
9
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
12
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
16
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
18
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.7%
22
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%
25
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
26
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
27
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%