Transformation-tolerant object recognition in tree shrews despite lacking a fovea
Meyer, E. E.; Ong, W. S.; Song, C.; Cottaris, N. P.; Zhang, L.-Q.; Collina, J.; Brainard, D. H.; Arcaro, M. J.
Show abstract
Object recognition depends on the ability to extract stable representations across changes in how they are viewed, yet it remains unclear how this capacity depends on visual acuity and cortical hierarchy. We combined behavioral testing and computational modeling to determine whether tree shrews, close relatives of primates with lower spatial acuity, can perform transformation-tolerant object recognition. Front-end modeling incorporating species-specific optics and photoreceptor sampling showed that, when scaled for acuity, tree shrew retinal filtering preserves the similarity structure of natural image categories relevant for object recognition. Behaviorally, tree shrews reliably discriminated complex objects across variations in position, scale, and viewpoint, including when embedded within natural scenes, and generalized to novel exemplars. Their recognition behavior was best explained by visual features emphasizing differences in global shape and size between objects and by representations from intermediate and deep layers of hierarchical neural network models. These results demonstrate that visual processing supporting object-level generalization can arise within visual systems lacking high-acuity front-end optics and establish the tree shrew as a key model for understanding the computational and evolutionary origins of high-level vision.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Gain, not concomitant changes in spatial receptive field properties, improves task performance in a neural network attention model 95%
- A general decoding strategy explains the relationship between behavior and correlated variability 95%
- A Bayesian and efficient observer model explains concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in visual perception 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.