Back

Morphological and functional characterization of the ptychocyte, a stingless stinging cell

Hoffman Sole, A.; Bolstad, K.; James, E.; Roh, C.; Babonis, L. S.

2026-04-10 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.10.717713 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cnidocytes (stinging cells), unique to cnidarians (corals, anemones, jellyfish), have diversified into distinct types with variable forms and functions. Nematocytes, cnidocytes found in all cnidarians, are used for prey capture and defense. When triggered, a pressurized capsule inside the nematocyte releases a harpoon-like structure attached to a hollow tubule that pierces prey and delivers venom. Ptychocytes, a cnidocyte unique to tube anemones (sister to corals and sea anemones) discharge a long spineless tubule used exclusively to build the tube in which the animal lives. Given that nematocytes and ptychocytes are specialized for different functions, we hypothesized that they might respond to firing cues in different ways. To test this, we examined the morphology, function, and distribution of nematocytes and ptychocytes in the North American Tube Anemone, Ceriantheopsis americana. We determined that ptychocytes have apical sensory structures like the cones previously described on nematocytes. Surprisingly, the body wall has a dense population of multiciliated cells that appear to function in tube formation. To determine how divergent selection pressures may have affected firing dynamics, we compared the discharge kinematics of cnidocytes from C. americana and the model sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis. Both nematocytes and ptychocytes from C. americana fired slower than nematocytes from N. vectensis, suggesting the rapid discharge speed of sea anemone nematocytes resulted from modification to these cells after sea anemones and tube anemones diverged from their common ancestor. By comparing the morphology and function of different cnidocytes, we can reconstruct the steps that gave rise to cnidocyte diversity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.0%
2
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.2%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.2%
4
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
8
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.0%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.0%
10
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.7%
15
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
EvoDevo
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
20
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
27
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%