Back

Multicenter preclinical validation of next-generation CAR T cells: a strategy for harmonization, reproducibility, and its feasibility in clinical translation

Dalloul, I.; Barden, M.; Wilcke, J.; Bernhard, S.; Ellenbach, N.; Boulesteix, A.-L.; Abken, H.; Kobold, S.

2026-04-10 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.04.10.717659 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeClinical translation of CAR T cell therapies has accelerated, yet preclinical evidence still often originates from single-center studies lacking sufficient robustness. Preclinical confirmatory multicenter studies have been proposed to improve the translational success, but their feasibility in cellular therapies remains unexplored. MethodsWe performed a confirmatory multicenter study validating C-C-motive-receptor-8 (CCR8) overexpression in CAR T cells--a strategy previously shown to enhance solid tumor infiltration. In vitro experiments covering activation, cytotoxicity, and migration using three CAR constructs were conducted across two centers with harmonized materials, preregistered protocols, randomization, and blinding. ResultsThe data from the two centers confirmed key findings of the exploratory study: CCR8 overexpression in anti-EpCAM and anti-mesothelin CAR T cells leads to enhanced selective migration towards a CCL1-gradient, while not compromising antigen-specific T cell activatory capacity and cytotoxicity in vitro. The study furthermore broadened the applicability of CCR8 overexpression to anti-CEA CAR T cells. ConclusionsThis first-of-its-kind preclinical confirmatory CAR T study demonstrates the feasibility of a multicenter confirmation in cellular therapy, with technical and logistical challenges resolved through transparent communication between all parties involved. Both exploratory and confirmatory studies aim to downselect CAR candidates with the highest clinical success potential, as they compete for limited resources in preclinical research. It is therefore mandatory to clarify the extent of replications required to validate the experimental methodology and identify CAR candidates with most likelihood of success. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCEPreclinical evidence for novel CAR T cell therapeutic strategies relies mostly on exploratory single-center studies lacking robustness, with recent findings substantiating their limited predictive value for cellular therapies tested outside hematology. Here, the function of CCR8-armored CARs in vitro was confirmed in a preclinical confirmatory multicenter study, demonstrating the feasibility of such studies in adding value to the transition of preclinical concepts to clinical development. Our first-of-its-kind study may contribute to define new routes for preclinical testing and further raises the general question of what level of preclinical evidence is reasonably achievable in an academic context. It indicates the need for strong collaborative efforts to realize dedicated preclinical infrastructure for clinical translation of reprogrammed immune cellular therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.1%
3
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.1%
5
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.5%
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
11
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
12
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
13
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
15
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
16
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
18
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
24
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
26
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
29
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%