Neurophysiological correlates of processing Agreement and Tense in Arabic

Most syntactic approaches converge on the fact that Tense and Agreement are two different functional categories, although there is less agreement on their exact representation and relative hierarchical order. Cross-linguistic agrammatic data seems to support the difference between Tense and Agreement, with patterns of dissociation reported from agrammatism between them, in which Tense is generally more impaired than Agreement. To examine whether there is evidence for such a dissociation of tense and agreement processing in neurotypical individuals, the present study employed Event-Related brain Potentials (ERPs) to study the real-time comprehension of Modern Standard Arabic sentences. Critical stimulus sentences were of the form Temporal Adverb-Subject-Verb-PP, in which the intransitive verb was in either the past or future tense, and was preceded by a singular or plural subject and an adverb indicating past or future tense. The subject nouns were all human and either masculine or feminine. The verbs either agreed with the subject noun or presented a person, number or gender agreement violation. They also either agreed or showed a mismatch with the temporal frame of the adverb, the latter being a tense violation. Results at the verb showed that both tense and agreement violations yielded a biphasic N400 - P600 effect. We discuss these results in light of previous ERP findings and conclude that despite the putative configurational differences between Tense and Agreement, the processing of the two categories in Arabic may deploy the same underlying cognitive mechanisms.