Back

Digital Health and Data Utilisation for Improved Primary Health Services Delivery: Multi-Site Perspectives from Quality Improvement Teams in Council Hospitals in Tanzania

Matimo, C. R.; Kacholi, G.; Mollel, H. A.

2026-04-17 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.10.26350674 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDigital health plays an indispensable role in facilitating data analysis and use for enhancing healthcare delivery across health settings. However, there is scant information on the extent to which digital health influences the improvement of primary health services delivery through data use. This study examined the determinants that influence the use of digital health to improve health service delivery in council hospitals in Tanzania. MethodsA cross-sectional design was employed in six regions, involving 12 council hospitals. We used a self-administered questionnaire to collect data from 203 members of hospital quality improvement teams. Descriptive analysis was used to determine the frequency, proportion, and mean of responses, while bootstrapping analysis was conducted to test the statistically significant influence of digital health factors on data use for improving health service delivery. ResultsResults show moderate agreement on data compatibility for planning and decision-making, with 40.4% of respondents agreeing it supports ordering commodities, 43.8% for staff allocation, and 38.4% for planning. However, dissatisfaction was higher for user-friendliness (47.8%), reliability (up to 65.5%), and usefulness (up to 63.5%). Overall, 50.2% (M=2.74{+/-}0.87) disagreed that digital systems effectively support data use. Structural model analysis confirmed significant positive influence of usefulness ({beta}=0.199, p<0.001) and access to quality data ({beta}=0.729, p<0.001) on data use, which strongly impacted service delivery ({beta}=0.593, p<0.001), despite some factors showing no direct influence. ConclusionThe study finds that current digital health initiatives only modestly improve the user-friendliness, reliability, and usefulness of data systems, partly due to fragmented, non-interoperable platforms that burden data management. However, compatibility, usability, reliability, and usefulness of digital tools significantly enhance access to quality data and data-driven decisions. The study recommends strengthening and integrating existing systems and providing continuous digital health training to institutionalize data-informed decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.8%
3
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
10
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
12
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%