Back

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the ISBAR Structured Handover Observation Tool in ICU-to-ward patient transfer

Ni, N.; Zhao, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Ding, J.; Liu, T.

2026-04-14 nursing
10.64898/2026.04.10.26350669 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract The ISBAR framework is used to standardize clinical handovers and enhance patient safety. Observational tools based on ISBAR have been developed to assess the completeness of information transfer. However, these instruments have primarily been developed in non-Chinese contexts, and validated Chinese-language observational tools suitable for clinical practice remain limited. In this study, a cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the ISBAR Structured Handover Observation Tool was conducted, examining its reliability and discriminant validity in Chinese clinical settings. The study was conducted in two phases: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation in real-world clinical settings. Content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index (CVI), and inter-rater reliability was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) based on a two-way mixed-effects model with absolute agreement. Discriminant validity was examined using the Mann-Whitney U test to compare scores across nurses with varying levels of clinical experience. A total of 233 handover cases involving patient transfers from the intensive care unit (ICU) to general wards were collected, involving 84 nurses. The scale demonstrated good content validity, with item-level content validity indices (CVI) ranging from 0.88 to 1.00 and a scale-level CVI/Ave of 0.98. The inter-rater reliability, assessed using fifty randomly selected cases, was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.885 for single-rater assessments and 0.939 for average-rater assessments. Discriminant validity analysis showed that nurses with more clinical experience had significantly higher total scores than those with less experience (Z = -4.772, p < 0.001). The Chinese version of the ISBAR Structured Handover Observation Tool demonstrates good content validity, high inter-rater reliability, and acceptable discriminant validity. This tool provides a standardized and practical method for assessing the completeness of information transfer and is expected to support quality improvement in patient handover from the ICU to general wards in Chinese clinical settings.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
24.5%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.9%
3
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.9%
5
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.3%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.7%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
10
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.0%
11
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
12
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
20
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%