Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the ISBAR Structured Handover Observation Tool in ICU-to-ward patient transfer
Ni, N.; Zhao, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Ding, J.; Liu, T.
Show abstract
The ISBAR framework is used to standardize clinical handovers and enhance patient safety. Observational tools based on ISBAR have been developed to assess the completeness of information transfer. However, these instruments have primarily been developed in non-Chinese contexts, and validated Chinese-language observational tools suitable for clinical practice remain limited. In this study, a cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the ISBAR Structured Handover Observation Tool was conducted, examining its reliability and discriminant validity in Chinese clinical settings. The study was conducted in two phases: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation in real-world clinical settings. Content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index (CVI), and inter-rater reliability was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) based on a two-way mixed-effects model with absolute agreement. Discriminant validity was examined using the Mann-Whitney U test to compare scores across nurses with varying levels of clinical experience. A total of 233 handover cases involving patient transfers from the intensive care unit (ICU) to general wards were collected, involving 84 nurses. The scale demonstrated good content validity, with item-level content validity indices (CVI) ranging from 0.88 to 1.00 and a scale-level CVI/Ave of 0.98. The inter-rater reliability, assessed using fifty randomly selected cases, was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.885 for single-rater assessments and 0.939 for average-rater assessments. Discriminant validity analysis showed that nurses with more clinical experience had significantly higher total scores than those with less experience (Z = -4.772, p < 0.001). The Chinese version of the ISBAR Structured Handover Observation Tool demonstrates good content validity, high inter-rater reliability, and acceptable discriminant validity. This tool provides a standardized and practical method for assessing the completeness of information transfer and is expected to support quality improvement in patient handover from the ICU to general wards in Chinese clinical settings.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Patient Safety Curriculum: An Interventional Study on the Effectiveness of Patient Safety Education for Jordanian Nursing Students 95%
- The experience of European hospital-based health care workers on following infection prevention and control procedures for COVID-19 93%
- Stressors, Manifestations and Course of COVID-19 Related Distress Among Nurses and Midwives in Tasmania 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical practice competencies for standard critical care nursing: Consensus statement based on a systematic review and Delphi survey 97%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 94%
- Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 93%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 92%
- Physiological and Psychological Effects of Parental Traditional Thai Massage on Children with Autism: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 94%
- Competency for Japanese Novice Medical Laboratory Scientists: A Delphi Method 94%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 94%
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 93%
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: A latent profile analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.