Ventilator triggering control with an LSTM-Based Model
Liu, J.; Fan, J.; Deng, Z.; Tang, X.; Zhang, H.; Sharma, A.; Li, Q.; Liang, C.; Wang, A. Y.; Liu, L.; Luo, K.; Liu, H.; Qiu, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundPatient-ventilator synchrony, an essential prerequisite for non-invasive mechanical ventilation, requires an accurate matching of every phase of the respiration between patient and the ventilator. MethodsWe developed a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based model that can predict the inspiratory and expiratory time of the patient. This model consisted of two hidden layers, each with eight LSTM units, and was trained using a dataset of approximately 27000 of 500-ms-long flow signals that captured both inspiratory and expiratory events. ResultsThe LSTM model achieved 97% accuracy and F1 score in the test data, and the average trigger error was less than 2.20%. In the first trial, 10 volunteers were enrolled. In "Compliance" mode, 78.6% of the triggering by the LSTM model was compatible with neuronal respiration, which was higher than Auto-Trak model (74.2%). Auto-Trak model performed marginally better in the modes of pressure support = 5 and 10 cmH2O. Considering the success in the first clinical trial, we further tested the models by including five patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The LSTM model exhibited 60.6% of the triggering in the 33%-box, which is better than 49.0% of Auto-Trak model. And the PVI index of the LSTM model was significantly less than Auto-Trak model (36.5% vs 52.9%). ConclusionsOverall, the LSTM model performed comparable to, or even better than, Auto-Trak model in both latency and PVI index. While other mathematical models have been developed, our model was effectively embedded in the chip to control the triggering of ventilator. Trial registrationApproval Number: 2023ZDSYLL348-P01; Approval Date: 28/09/2023. Clinical Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2500097446; Registration Date: 19/02/2025.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifiable identification of flow-limited ventilator dyssynchrony with the deformed lung ventilator model 96%
- AI-MET: A Deep Learning-based Clinical Decision Support System for Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from Endemic Typhus 92%
- SymScore: Machine Learning Accuracy Meets Transparency in a Symbolic Regression-Based Clinical Score Generator 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Descriptive characteristics of continuous oximetry measurement in moderate to severe COVID-19 patients 93%
- Performance of EasyBreath ® Decathlon Snorkeling mask for Delivering Continuous Positive Airway Pressure 92%
- Kinematic signature of high-risk labored breathing revealed by novel signal analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection and Classification of Cardiac Arrhythmias by a Challenge-Best Deep Learning Neural Network Model 90%
- M3NetFlow: A novel multi-scale multi-hop graph AI model for integrative multi-omic data analysis 89%
- Development and Clinical Validation of a Miniaturized Finger Probe for Bedside Hemodynamic Monitoring 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transformer-based deep learning model for the diagnosis of suspected lung cancer in primary care based on electronic health record data 89%
- Enhancing Early Detection of Cognitive Decline in the Elderly through Ensemble of NLP Techniques: A Comparative Study Utilizing Large Language Models in Clinical Notes 88%
- Deep Learning Prediction of Biomarkers from Echocardiogram Videos 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- PVP1–The People’s Ventilator Project: A fully open, low-cost, pressure-controlled ventilator 93%
- Computational simulation to assess patient safety of uncompensated COVID-19 two-patient ventilator sharing using the Pulse Physiology Engine 93%
- Predicting Mechanical Ventilation Effects on Six Human Tissue Transcriptomes 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.