Balancing Inhibition and Sparsity for Stable, Accurate Cerebellar Learning
Yu, L.; Yang, Z.; Bao, Y.; Zang, Y.
Show abstract
The cerebellums structured circuitry supports learning across motor and cognitive domains, yet the coding strategies in granule cells that enable this versatility remain unclear. Using a theoretical cerebellar model, we examined how feedforward inhibition (FFI) and feedback inhibition (FBI) shape granule cell activation patterns to optimize learning in two tasks: complex trace learning and pattern identification. For trace learning, performance depends on spatiotemporally ordered granule cell activity shaped by FBI, with temporal sparsity emerging as the key determinant of accuracy. For pattern identification, both pathways support high accuracy, with only slight sensitivity to pathway choice. In both tasks, spatial sparsity becomes critical in incremental learning to prevent memory interference, a role reinforced by advanced synaptic plasticity strategies. These findings identify sparse granule cell activation as a unifying principle for cerebellar learning and reveal task-dependent roles of inhibitory pathways, providing a mechanistic framework for understanding stability-plasticity trade-offs in cerebellar learning.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning prediction error neurons in a canonical interneuron circuit 98%
- Flexible control of representational dynamics in a disinhibition-based model of decision making 97%
- Minimal requirements for a neuron to co-regulate many properties and the implications for ion channel correlations and robustness 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Geometry of neural computation unifies working memory and planning 97%
- Random noise promotes slow heterogeneous synaptic dynamics important for robust working memory computation 96%
- A modeling framework for adaptive lifelong learning with transfer and savings through gating in the prefrontal cortex 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.