Back

Rate-Dependent Mechanical Behavior of Human Femoropopliteal Arteries in Biaxial Testing

Kargarbahrkhazar, B.; Razian, S. A.; Jadidi, M.

2026-04-13 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.09.717509 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionArteries, like other soft tissues, exhibit viscoelastic mechanical behavior, meaning their response to stress and strain is time dependent. This implies that the way arteries deform depends not only on the amount of force applied but also on the rate at which the force is applied. This study investigates the effects of different loading rates on the mechanical behavior of human femoropopliteal arteries (FPAs) to understand their rate-dependent characteristics. MethodsHuman FPA specimens were collected from 14 donors, including 7 males and 7 females, aged 45-55 years. A 10x10 mm segment was isolated, mounted onto a biaxial testing device, and subjected to varying loading rates (10 to 50 mN/s). Mechanical responses were recorded, and stress-stretch curves were analyzed. Statistical analyses, including mixed-design ANOVA, assessed the impact of sex and loading rates on tissue stiffness. ResultsResults indicated significant loading-rate dependency, particularly in the circumferential direction. Stretch values decreased with increasing loading rates, more prominently in the circumferential than in the longitudinal direction (p-value<0.01). Statistical analyses revealed no significant interaction between sex and loading rate, though male arteries exhibited slightly higher compliance than female arteries. DiscussionThe findings demonstrate that the mechanical response of FPAs is highly dependent on the loading rate, with more pronounced effects observed in the circumferential direction. At higher loading rates, the human FPAs demonstrated a stiffer response in the circumferential direction. DedicationWe dedicate this work to the memory of our late student, Ali Zolfaghari Sichani, who passed away tragically during his doctoral studies. Ali performed the majority of the experiments and the initial analysis reported in this paper. His passion, dedication, and hard work were the foundation of this research, and he is deeply missed.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.7%
2
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
5
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
7
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
8
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
25
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%